10/9/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

still have to get DNR permits. The Moorings is a good example of this. Commissioner Wodtke believed that while it is going to be relatively easy for a large developer to get a permit through Tallahassee, it is going to be very hard on a single family to go through this whole procedure to get a permit for one little dock. Director Keating interjected that a lot of these recommendations try to ensure some kind of coordination among all the various agencies and jurisdictions that have responsibility for regulating development and other activity within the aquatic preserve area. He noted that a lot of these things that we are discussing today are already in effect in the general rules relating to all aquatic preserves. Commissioner Bird understood that the proposed management plan will go through a series of public hearings to receive testimony before it is finally adopted and felt it would be a little premature for us to go ahead and adopt this today before we see what the final draft looks like. Chairman Lyons believed it was the Board's concensus that Mr. Challacombe be appointed to attend the meeting and convey our concerns. The Commissioners indicated their agreement. Mr. Challacombe understood he was to ask for clarification of the status of mosquito impoundments and the recreational impact to the spoil island areas. Commissioner Wodtke was concerned also about the control by the Marine Fisheries Commission as noted in Item (X), and Mr. Challacombe believed the directive given in that item was directed to the DNR enforcement s.taff. Chairman Lyons agreed that question needed an answer. Commissioner Wodtke also felt that Items (Y) and (Z) were inconsistent and wanted to know if that meant that the local plan has to jibe with the State plan or the other way around. He wished to have Mr. Challacombe get further clarification re the many inconsistencies with the DNR and DER about what local rules 33 OCT 9 1985 Qo� 62i