My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/16/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:11:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transportation System <br />The subject property has direct access to Kings Highway (classified as <br />an arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare Plan). If developed <br />with the property to the south, direct access would also be available <br />to State Road 60 (also classified as an arterial street). Development <br />of the subject property for a community shopping center could attract <br />up to 6,747 average annual daily trips (AADT). If developed with the <br />property to the south, the maximum development of the two properties <br />could attract up to 13,770 AADT. State Road 60 currently carries <br />approximately 15,000 AADT at level -of -service "A". Kings Highway <br />currently carries approximately 5,300 AADT at level -of -service "A". <br />This proposed development would reduce the level -of -service on these <br />two facilities to level -of -service "C". <br />Environment <br />The subject property is not designated as environmentally sensitive <br />nor is it in a flood -prone area. <br />Utilities <br />County water is available for the subject property, and County waste- <br />water facilities will be available in the near future. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the above analysis, particularly the fact that less than <br />twenty (20%) percent of the node's acreage is used or being developed <br />for commercial uses and the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommen- <br />dation, staff recommends that the node not be enlarged. Based on the <br />recommendation not to enlarge the node, the fact that including the <br />subject property in the node would require deleting another property <br />from the node, and the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommenda- <br />tion, staff recommends that the node boundary not be altered to <br />include the subject property. Based on the recommendation that the <br />subject property not be included in the node, the fact that the <br />subject property abuts a single-family subdivision to the north, and <br />the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, staff recommends <br />that thg-,request to rezone the subject property to CG be denied. <br />October 7, 1985 <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />1840 - 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 <br />RE: Rezoning of property located on S.R. 60 and 58th Avenue <br />Public Hearing on October 16, 1985 <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />My wife and I will unfortunately be out of town for the hearing <br />on the above referenced rezoning matter. We would like to <br />state that we are opposed to this rezoning and ask that you <br />consider it carefully before a final decision has been made. <br />This letter is being sent to inform you of our opposition and <br />also that no one will be at the meeting representing us. <br />Very truly yours, . <br />John D. Almond, III <br />5875 - 23rd Street <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.