10/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OCT 2 3 1985 BOOK 62 Fac -t 505: Attorney Henderson noted that their presentation deals primarily with the existing conditions on.the land and it addresses the environmental factors that are involved. He pointed out that the proposed plan was submitted to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and out of that came the Development Order which the Board is also considering. It is very difficult to separate this. Commissioner Scurlock felt that is a D.R.I. matter. This is a rezoning and Comprehensive Plan change, and he would rather not talk about site plans and pretty pictures now. Attorney Henderson stated that he did not want the Board to vote in a vacuum on the zoning and Land Use Plan change and suggested possibly they could vote on the rezonings, etc., after the hearing on the Development Order because the rezoning was requested specifically fitting the plan that has been developed with exact legal descriptions. Attorney Henderson continued that the Development Order must lay the basis for more submittals, and they still have to go through a detailed procedure of reviews and permits. He also stressed that the Development Order when passed will be recorded on the public record and as such would be a control and act as a land use regulation of this specific property. Chairman Lyons noted that one of his concerns is the possibility that the project might not go through after the rezoning was granted, and then how do we stand on the environmentally sensitive land. Attorney Henderson believed anyone ever involved with the property would be faced with coming in and asking for a modification of the Development Order. b It was noted that the Development Order expires in three years. Director Keating explained that staff looked at this from the perspective of whether the Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings would stand by themselves and came to the conclusion 56