My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/31/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/31/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/31/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I CT 3 <br />1985 BOOK 62 PAGE 614 <br />William Caldwell, attorney representing Ralph Sexton, <br />owner of Old Sugar Mill Estates on 12th Street, asked if <br />Alternate #2 indicates that the developer might be <br />compensated for more than the additional 40 -feet of <br />right-of-way that will be needed to bring the road up to the <br />width specifications for a primary collector. He noted it <br />is advantageous for a developer of a multi -family project to <br />dedicate right-of-way when they receive a transfer of <br />densities in return, but a transfer of densities would not <br />be a benefit to Old Sugar Mill Estates, a single-family <br />development. <br />Commissioner Wodtke understood that this policy <br />concerns only those roads adjacent to existing canals, and, <br />basically, what we are saying is that if we need additional <br />right-of-way for a thoroughfare, we have the Drainage <br />District with 30 feet for their canal and the 30 feet road <br />right-of-way; and whatever additional road right-of-way is <br />needed, whether it is 50, 60 or 70 feet, that this policy <br />will come into play. Being that we cannot get some <br />right-of-way on both sides of the road, we are going to <br />compensate the owner for the part that is extra that is <br />going to come off the north side at sometime in the future. <br />He stressed that this policy only concerns roads next to <br />existing canals. <br />Tom Adams of the Water District advised that the <br />District plans on just maintaining the canals, rather than <br />filling them in, but it is possible that they might have to <br />enlarge some. <br />.Commissioner Wodtke felt in that case, we should not go <br />into any of the District's right-of-way, but Mr. Adams <br />stated they would maintain them on the County's <br />right-of-way. <br />The Commissioners accepted Commissioner Wodtke's <br />earlier statement as policy setting instructions to staff. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.