Laserfiche WebLink
In many older subdivisions, there are a number of houses <br />which were constructed prior to the enactment of the <br />existing regulations. Consequently, these homes have a <br />lower finished grade than houses currently being built. <br />To compound this problem there is a lack of drainage <br />ditches, swales, and easements in these older subdi- <br />visions, thereby reducing alternatives for diverting the <br />runoff. In some cases, recently constructed homes have <br />had their stormwater directed to the adjacent property, <br />producing flooded conditions on those lots. <br />Present County Policy <br />For single-family homes in either recorded subdivisions <br />or on metes and bounds lots, the County does not address <br />drainage issues. In fact, most County ordinances, <br />including stormwater management, landscaping, tree <br />protection, and others, exempt single-family homes. <br />While setback criteria, other zoning requirements, <br />septic tank rules, and proposed right-of-way improve- <br />ments are addressed on single-family homes, these are <br />reviewed as part of the building permit application <br />process. <br />In. relation to the single-family stormwater runoff <br />problem, the County has attempted to address the problem <br />on a case-by-case, after -the -fact basis. Since"no <br />current ordinance provisions give the County the right <br />to require the submittal of drainage plans for sin- <br />gle-family home construction or to enforce a <br />no -discharge policy, the County has been precluded from <br />taking action to prevent this problem before it occurs <br />or to rectify the problem once it exists. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />There are two principal alternatives for addressing this <br />issue. The first alternative is for the County to continue <br />its present policy and take no action. Under this scenario, <br />stormwater runoff problems would need to be resolved by the <br />homeowners involved; the County would not regulate stormwater <br />on single-family lots. The second alternative is for the <br />County to regulate stormwater discharges from single-family <br />lots, requiring that a homeowner not adversely affect his <br />neighbor with drainage and then enforcing this requirement. <br />County regulation of stormwater runoff could take several <br />forms. While single-family stormwater, requirements, if <br />enacted, should be incorporated within the County's zoning <br />code, these requirements could either mandate a drainage plan <br />to be reviewed by the County as part of the building permit <br />application process, or the regulations could mandate that no <br />single-family lot may have runoff directed to an adjacent <br />parcel, and the County could regulate this at the time of its <br />certificate of occupancy inspection. With the former method, <br />the County would need sufficient information to review the <br />proposed drainage plan; it would require more staff time by <br />the Public Works Department (the Department which would <br />review the drainage plan as part of the overall interdepart- <br />mental building permit review system); and it would require a <br />site inspection by the Public Works Department prior to <br />issuance of a CO. With the latter method_, the responsibility <br />to design and construct an adequate drainage system would be <br />the applicant's. The applicant would, at the. time of the <br />building permitlapplication, certify that drainage will not <br />impact an adjacent lot, and this system would be reviewed for <br />adequacy only after it had been completed. <br />3 <br />OCT 3 11985 Boa 62 589 <br />