My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/03/2015
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
10/03/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2015 12:56:02 PM
Creation date
12/29/2015 12:55:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/03/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2014/2015: The south SR A-1-A ("Segal") case was heard by the Code Enforcement Board (CEB). <br /> In that case, the CEB voted 4-1 to find a violation of parking location regulations and entered a <br /> continuing order "that parking not occur in anything other than the designated parking area". The <br /> vacation rental owner appealed the CEB decision to circuit court. That lawsuit is currently pending. <br /> In February and May 2015, the Board considered vacation rental issues and directed staff to initiate <br /> adoption of vacation rental parking regulations and an ordinance prohibiting renting-out a single- <br /> family residence for special events such as weddings and reunions. <br /> On July 14, 2015, the Board adopted a resolution establishing an advisory committee to make <br /> recommendations to the Board regarding any additional local regulations needed beyond the parking <br /> regulations ordinance and event prohibition ordinance already being considered. That committee, <br /> which will automatically sunset within one year of its first meeting or when it makes <br /> recommendations to the Board (whichever occurs first), will be known as the Short Term Vacation <br /> Rental Advisory Committee. In August, Commissioners made their district appointments to the <br /> committee, and the Board voted to appoint two at-large members and one alternate for the south beach <br /> property owners association representative who serves on the committee. Staff anticipates that the <br /> committee will convene this fall. <br /> Existing Indian River County Residential Parking Regulations <br /> Regulations on the number and location of automobiles regularly parked at a single-family residence are <br /> intended to maintain the visual/aesthetic character of residential neighborhoods, while accommodating <br /> parking needs. For any residential unit, the general parking minimum is two spaces per unit. That <br /> parking standard minimum is typical for most jurisdictions and for a single-family residence is easily met <br /> by providing a standard driveway. Current County parking regulations for a single-family zoned lot allow <br /> a maximum of 3 automobiles (not including RVs, which are separately regulated) to be parked outside an <br /> unenclosed area, with two exceptions. One exception allows for one additional vehicle for each licensed <br /> driver permanently residing at the residence. The second exception allows the parking of automobiles by <br /> persons visiting the residence without those automobiles counting toward the previously described <br /> limitations. The current regulations also prohibit parking within a required yard such as within the front <br /> yard setback area of a lot. It should be noted that in general, a car may be parked (but not stored) within a <br /> public local road right-of-way. <br /> It is staff's position that the existing code's exception for parking by persons visiting the residence (the <br /> second exception described above) is not intended to apply to vacation unit renters or "guests" of the <br /> vacation unit renters. Although the current code is not clear on that point, that issue will be clarified and <br /> addressed through adoption of the "Ordinance 1" amendment now being considered. <br /> Comparison of Parking Standards for Vacation Rentals <br /> Staff has researched vacation rental parking standards and obtained information from nine Florida local <br /> governments as well as information from six out-of-state local jurisdictions (see attachment #7). Staff's <br /> research indicates that Vero Beach specifically prohibits vacation rentals and therefore has no standards <br /> relating to that use. Neither Fellsmere nor Sebastian have specific standards for vacation rentals, the same <br /> as Indian River County. <br /> Several of the surveyed jurisdictions specifically restrict vacation rental parking locations to driveways <br /> and designated areas (Islamorada, Bal Harbor Village, and communities in California and Nevada). With <br /> respect to regulating the number of parking spaces, several jurisdictions require a minimum number of <br /> spaces or fraction of a space per room. A few jurisdictions limit the maximum number of spaces based on <br /> the number of designated spaces shown on a local government vacation rental application. <br /> M:%AGENDA%Current Year\2015\I0-13.15 Continued ParkingRegsVacRentalsOrdinance.docx 4 94 <br /> �I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.