My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/27/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
11/27/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:32 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:17:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/27/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Scurlock did not anticipate these numbers to <br />change much over 7 years, except for the rounds of.play and the <br />fee charges; however, this structure gives us the ability to <br />raise the cost of <br />green fees, <br />etc. <br />He felt we <br />will have <br />to <br />monitor the play <br />fee closely <br />to make <br />sure that <br />we are not <br />driving <br />away players. <br />Mr. Diamond explained the following assumptions that he used <br />independent of Commissioner Scurlock's figures to come up with a <br />financing structure that is realistic in view of today's market <br />environment: <br />1) <br />$2.1 <br />million <br />would <br />have to be <br />borrowed for <br />construction. <br />2) <br />Net <br />revenues <br />after <br />six years <br />of borrowing <br />the money would <br />approximate $333,288. <br />3) The method of borrowing would be a private placement at an <br />anticipated fixed rate of 7 3/4% for a 5 -year BAN with <br />financing after 5 years at 110 on a 25 -year bond issue. <br />Mr. Diamond also assumed that the County will borrow <br />sufficient money over 30 years to pay interest, because this is a <br />start-up operation. <br />Mr. Diamond recommended private placement because of the <br />following advantages <br />1) If we run into difficulties along the line, we would be able <br />to sit down and negotiate with one entity. <br />2) We would have the ability to amend the underlying document/ <br />resolution. <br />3) There is no need, unless the institution requires it, for the <br />County to rate the notes in any way since the County is <br />considered a sophisticated investor. <br />4) <br />Issuing costs <br />are somewhat <br />less. <br />5) <br />Some structure <br />can be cut <br />during initial negotiation with <br />the lending institution. <br />Commissioner Bird understood that the BANS will give us the <br />option of interim financing for the project and we can at some <br />41 <br />NOV 7 1985 BOOK ID2 fAc-L 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.