Laserfiche WebLink
JAN 15 1966 63 <br />Chairman Scurlock advised that he planned to vote against <br />the Motion as he did not feel we will get the best price by using <br />this process. He felt Commissioner Lyons will do an outstanding <br />job negotiating and knew the consulting firms get an average <br />price and that we would get a decent price, but he still felt <br />competitive bidding is the best process. He also did not think <br />60 days is all that important. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried 4 to 1 with <br />Chairman Scurlock voting in opposition. <br />R/W ACQUISITION - LATERAL "A" (HARRIET WILSON PROPERTY) <br />The Board reviewed staff memo, as follows: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: December 31, 1985FILE: <br />The Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH:: <br />Michael Wright, <br />County Administrator SUBJECT: <br />RIGHT OF MY ACQUISITION <br />James W. Davis, P.E. 0,LATERAL "A" - 66TH AVENUE <br />Public Works Director-` NORTH OF CR 510 <br />HARRIET WIIaSON PROPERTY <br />FROM: Donald G. Finney REFERENCES: REFERENCES: h. wilson r/w-agenda <br />Right of Way Acquisition Agent <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Board of County Commissioners previously approved condemnation but also <br />authorized staff to offer $16,127. for the __35' _right__of way (2.193±_Ac) - - <br />through Mrs. Wilson's attorney Ted Herzog as final negotiations. This is <br />the last remaining parcel to acquire before June 1986 , when all the <br />parcels will revert back to the property owners if not acquired. The <br />required right of way has been shortened 7' in width on the south half, <br />with the north half of the project remaining at the 351• right of w4y width. <br />This will enable the county to relocate the fence rather than replacing the <br />entire length of the R/W with new fence. In addition, this will save the <br />trees inside the pasture which was the property owners biggest concern. <br />The result will be a savings of roughly $4,000 to the county. The Board's <br />Previous authorization was $12,062. for 2.193± acres and $4,065 for the new <br />fencing = $16,127.00. The decreased land area is 1.82± acres and Mrs. <br />Wilson is now ready to settle for $16,000. The indicated market value <br />range for the subject property is $7,500 to $8,000 per acre at this date, <br />or 443;600 to $14,600 for the 1.82 acre parcel. <br />72 <br />