My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/22/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
1/22/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:00 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/22/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />Mr. and Mrs. James C. Broxton, Sr., the owners, are requesting to <br />rezone .36 acres located on the east side of 38th Avenue and <br />north of 44th Street from RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential <br />District (up to 10 units/acre), to CG, General Commercial Dis- <br />trict. <br />The. owners are proposing to develop the subject property for a <br />funeral chapel. Currently, funeral homes are only allowed in the <br />CG district. However, on January 9, 1986, the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission voted 4 -to -0 to recommend approval of a zoning <br />ordinance amendment which would provide a definition of funeral <br />chapels and establish them as a permitted use in both the CL, <br />Limited Commercial, and CG districts. <br />On December 12, 1985, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />3 -to -0 to recommend approval of this request. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli- <br />cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip- <br />tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur- <br />rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and <br />utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ- <br />mental quality. <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />Currently, the subject property is undeveloped. West of the <br />subject property is Carver Colony Unit No. 1, a subdivision <br />containing single-family residences and a coin operated laundry <br />zoned RM -10. North of the subject property is undeveloped land <br />and a single-family dwelling zoned RM -10. South of the subject <br />property, are the Stew Que restaurant, the Greenleaf Bar, and <br />undeveloped land zoned RM -10. Further south are buildings <br />containing a citrus business office and citrus worker housing. <br />East of the subject property is a single-family residence and <br />undeveloped land zoned RM -10. Southeast and adjacent to the <br />subject property are two single-family residences zoned RM -10. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and all of <br />the land around it as part of the Gifford MXD, Mixed -Use District <br />(up to 14 units/acre). The Comprehensive Plan states that within <br />MXD areas: <br />"The County shall encourage, where appropriate, <br />redevelopment in accordance with the dominant land uses and <br />the health, safety and welfare of area residents." <br />The Comprehensive Plan also states that the predominant land use <br />in the Gifford area is residential, although it also recognizes <br />that there are significant portions of land that are used for <br />commercial and industrial activities located within and adjacent <br />to residential areas. The staff feels that the predominant land <br />use around the subject property is single-family residential <br />although there are a few commercial uses in the area. However, <br />another consideration is the fact that the CG district, currently <br />required for a funeral chapel, is a general commercial zoning <br />district which allows a wide range of commercial activities <br />including many uses which would not be appropriate for property <br />adjacent to a single-family subdivision. In addition, because of <br />the size of the subject property, staff feels that rezoning the <br />subject property to CG would constitute spot zoning. <br />40a <br />L_ JAN 2 2 198; <br />BOOK 63 PAGE 36.8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.