2/5/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r FEB V 5 1986 Bou 63 F4.cr.535 recommendation in that it would establish a requirement of screening prospective users of the marina facilities prior to any transaction involving sales, leases, or rental agreements. The amendment would limit the term of lease or rental agreements to a. Period of 24 months. Thus, rather than requiring an annual boating record review o : f all marina users (as originally recommended by the Regional Planning Council), review of boating violations would be required prior to transactions. This would alleviate potential enforcement problems of prohibiting use of the facilities to persons having violated boating laws after purchase of a boat slip. Annual reports would have td document that effective screening for all marina user applicants had taken place for the reporting year. The amendment would limit the review of violations to. the five year period prior to the time of appli- cation for use, and would cancel the screening condition altogether if a slow speed zone is established for the inter -inlet area. Also, the amendment provides the developer an option to the screening condition, whereby an arrangement could be made to provide for increased enforcement of boating laws. If approved by the County and the Regional Planning Council, such an arrangement could substitute for the screening condition. The second amendment would specifically incorporate into the required stormwater management plan a measure to ensure that water quality in the marinas and waterways are not degraded via off-site sources of contaminants that might find their way into the river system. This amendment will clarify and spell -out water quality aspects addressed in the stormwater management provisions of the existing D.O. The amendment also specifically includes a provision that the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission will be consulted on the water quality issues of the plan. The third amendment would specifically.prohibit the use of shallow aquifer wells for irrigation. The original Council recommenda- tion was contradictory in regards to this issue, while the existing D.O. is silent on the issue. This amendment would clarify the original intent of both the Council and the County.. The fourth amendment would add to the requirements of the annual report. Each report would have to include documentation verifying that all applicants for marina use had been screened. The report requirement would be in effect for as long as the screening condition was in effect. This addition would incorporate some kind of accountability for the developer, to implement the screening condition. The County Attorney's office has reviewed the proposed amendments, and has verified that adoption of the proposed resolution would suffice to amend the Grand Harbor Development Order. Adoption of the resolution would incorporate the amendments into the adopted D.O. If adopted, staff will transmit copies of the amendments to the developer, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. Staff will also have the amended D.O. recorded. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution, amending the adopted Grand Harbor Development Order. 46 M