Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Vitunac pointed out that they have considered <br />making these advertisements more general so that we might have <br />any combination of acres in a certain area to reach the total <br />acreage of a node. That way everyone in the neighborhood would <br />be on notice that they may or may not be included in the node. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, that the Board establish the <br />boundaries of the node as indicated on the map <br />with the exception of the property on the east side <br />of Indian River Drive. <br />Under discussion, the Board discussed the property on the <br />east side of Indian River Drive and felt that the net effect of <br />the Motion would be that the Kroegels could continue to use their <br />property as they are now, expand it or sell it with the use. <br />Commissioner Bowman wished to see the entire node situation <br />revisited. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that if the goal is not to have any <br />additional acreage in commercial, the Board should go ahead and <br />include it in the node. <br />Commissioner Bird believed that by not including the Kroegel <br />property in the node, it leaves a cloud over the commercial use <br />of their property and that is the reason they wish to have it <br />clarified as being in the node. <br />Commissioner Lyons wanted to try to avoid any expansions of <br />commercial uses on the east side of the street, and Director <br />Keating felt that the Motion under discussion would accomplish <br />that objective, but suggested that the Board direct staff to go <br />ahead and reduce the size of the node and initiate a rezoning of <br />this property to residential which would grandfather in any <br />existing commercial uses, but not allow their expansion in the <br />future. <br />32 <br />FEBL- 19 1.9 86 NO. 63 PAGE 662 <br />