My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/22/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee Update Study Workshop
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />4. Assigning secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to <br />ensuring a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment, with <br />convenient interconnection to transit. <br />5. Establishing multimodal level of service standards that rely primarily on non- <br />vehicular modes of transportation where existing or planned community <br />design will provide adequate level of mobility. <br />6. Reducing impact fees or local access fees to promote development within <br />urban areas, multimodal transportation districts, and a balance of mixed-use <br />development in certain areas or districts,`.or'for affordable or workforce <br />housing. ; <br />Also, under HB 319, a mobility fee funding system expressly 'must comply with the dual <br />rational nexus test applicable to traditional impact fees. Furthermore, any mobility fee <br />revenues collected must be used to implement -.the local government's plan, which served <br />as the basis for the fee. Finally, under HB 319,'an°alternative mobility system, that is not <br />mobility fee-based, must not impose _upon new development any responsibility for funding <br />an existing transportation deficiency. '.. <br />The following paragraphs_ provide further', detail on`rthe generally applicable legal standards <br />applicable here. <br />Impact Fee Definition <br />• , 'An.impact fee is a orie-time capitalcharge levied against new development. <br />• An impact fee is designed to.cover the' portion of the capital costs of infrastructure <br />capacity consumed by new development. <br />• The principle purpose of an impact fee is to assist in funding the implementation of <br />projects'.identified in? the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and other capital <br />improvement programs for the respective facility/service categories. <br />Impact Fee vs. Tax <br />• An impact fee is generally regarded as a regulatory function established as a <br />condition for improving property and is not established for the primary purpose of <br />generating revenue, as are taxes. <br />• Impact fee expenditures must convey a proportional benefit to the fee payer. <br />• An impact fee must be tied to a proportional need for new infrastructure capacity <br />created by new development. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 4 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.