My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/22/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee Update Study Workshop
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />B <br />Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Table IV -4 <br />Public Building Total Cost per Functional Resident <br />Cost Component <br />- --- I <br />Total Building Valuer�1 <br />Figure <br />$94,594,130 <br />Percent of <br />Total Value (8) <br />95.14% <br />Total Land Value(2) <br />$4,832,100 <br />4.86% <br />Total Building and Land Value(3) <br />$99,426,230 <br />100.00% <br />Primary Building Square Footagel4l / <br />., 414,388 <br />Total Building and Land Value per Square Foot(5)$239.94 <br />Adopted LOS Standard - Bldg Sq Ft per Functional Reside'rit(,1 <br />2.10 <br />Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(7) „ � ti .- <br />$503.87 <br />(1) Source' Table IV -1 <br />(2) Source Table IV -1 <br />(3) Sum of building value (Item 1) and land value (Itern 2) <br />(4) Source Table IV -1 <br />(5) Total building and land value (Item 3) divided by primarybuilding square footage (Item 4) <br />(6) Source: Table IV -2x <br />(7) Building and land value per square foot (Itemm5) multiplied'by building square footage per functional <br />resident (Item 6) \ <br />(8) Percentage distribution of building value and la'nd value in relation to the combined building and land <br />value <br />Credit Component" <br />To avoid overcharging development°for the public buildings impact fee, a review of the <br />capital,financing:program for public buildings wasconducted. The purpose of this review <br />was to determine a'ny potential revenue credits that should be considered for revenues <br />generated by new development that could be used for capital facilities and land expansion <br />for public\buildings. To estimate an' average annual non -impact fee expenditure, capital <br />projects funded the past five years and programmed for the next five years were <br />reviewed. Basedon this analysis, a credit for these expenditures is provided in Table IV -5, <br />which results in an average annual credit of $5 per functional resident. It should be noted <br />that a large part of this funding is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in <br />2019. The credit calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re -adopted. If the sales <br />tax is re -adopted, the credit calculations should be evaluated to determine if a revision is <br />necessary. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 38 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.