My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/22/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established <br />through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the <br />"dual rational nexus" test, which requires`that they: <br />• Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to <br />the need created by new development paying the fee; and <br />• Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, <br />typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the <br />ff <br />County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another <br />planning document/Master Plan. <br />rcff. , r <br />d��gn <br />In addition, one of the requirements of the 200_gi,Florida Impact e- Act is that the studies <br />be based on most recent and localized data° <br />a <br />This technical reportreared to su <br />has been 4�y <br />prepared p pport`�legal�compliance with = js ing case law <br />and statutory requirements. Altho Gghcthe Florida courts have yet to expressly address the <br />methodology underpinning the Affordablle.°Grpwth Strategy,, this aspect of the report is <br />based on the long-standing legal standards described in this report. The technical report <br />also documents the methodology components for ,eachaof to impact fee areas, including an <br />d.o__ <br />..QA• <br />C,. <br />. air, �- <br />evaluation of the'inventory, service area, level of -service ('LOS), cost, credit, and demand <br />components. Information support ng this ana ysis was obtained from the County and other <br />sources,aas-indicated. Th report" <br />eludess resultstfor all program areas, with the exception <br />of edduAional facilities. Because the initia o sults have not yet been reviewed by the <br />India River County Schoo Board ti his section isnot included in this report. <br />`4.941t. <br />Three primary=factors affected the Count's impact fee levels: <br />• Since 2005, t'e;Counfy-built additional infrastructure and increased the capital asset <br />inventory signing -0y in most program areas. This results in an increased asset <br />value, which in turn, increases the impact fee. <br />• In most infrastructure areas, the County used or is still using other revenue sources <br />to supplement impact fees, such as optional sales tax revenues, ad valorem tax <br />revenues, and other revenues. Depending on the program area and the level of on- <br />going investment, this results in an increase in the credit component for some <br />program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In others, if the investment <br />was made in earlier years and are not projected to continue at the same levels, the <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 <br />ES -2 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.