Laserfiche WebLink
G. IRC Bid #284 - Traffic Signal at SR -60 & 90th Avenue <br />The <br />Board <br />reviewed the <br />following memo <br />dated <br />3/7/86: <br />TO: Board of <br />County <br />Commissioners <br />DATE: March 7, <br />1986 <br />FILE: <br />i <br />THRU: Michael <br />Wright <br />SUBJECT: IRC BID <br />#284 -Traffic Signal <br />County <br />Administrator <br />SR60 at <br />90th Avenue <br />FROM* REFERENCES: <br />R NOES. <br />Carolynb odrich, Manager <br />Purchasi g Department <br />1. Description and Conditions <br />Bids were received Tuesday, March 4, 1986 at 11:00 A.M. for IRC BID #284 - <br />Traffic Signal, SR60 at 90th Avenue for the Traffic Engineering Department. <br />5 Bid Proposals were sent out. Of the 2 Bids received, 1 was a "No Bid". <br />2. Alternatives and Analysis <br />The only bid was received from Signal Construction, Jupiter, F1., in the <br />amount of $14,773.00. There is $12,500.00 budgeted for this project. The <br />County can install most of the signal in-house, with the exception or the <br />(4) concrete poles which can be re -bid. <br />3. Recommendation andFunding <br />Per the attached memo from Mike Orr, it is recommended that IRC #284 be <br />rejected, the (4) concrete poles be re -bid, and the County purchase the <br />materials and install the signal. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if installing this light in-house <br />would delay this project, and General Services Director Sonny <br />Dean reported that Mike Orr of Engineering has indicated it would <br />take 3 months to get it installed if we award the bid, and one <br />month longer if we do it ourselves. <br />The Commissioners wished to expedite the installation of <br />this badly needed traffic light. <br />8 <br />L_ AR 19 1986 BOOK 63 F,qa 89)3 <br />