Laserfiche WebLink
MAS 1 S' <br />Bou 3 F u,c 969 <br />uesday, March 18,1986 The Miami Herald SectionD r� <br />ru ing <br />Jud.cre. s <br />P.allid <br />Aft"*.' <br />.. <br />O O 0 <br />-Y <br />3y MARY JO TIERNEY <br />farad staff writer <br />PORT ST. LUCIE — Circuit Judge Philip Nourse's ruling that <br />come. mandatory water hookups, .ip Port St.,.Wcte.,.Wete Illegal . <br />,ould affect General Developmeat Uiiutj� s' . plag$ for future ' <br />!xpansion, officials said Monday. <br />The ruling also could affect <br />ether municipalities that want to `" Sl away said there was no <br />tet up a centralized water ser- Florida law on the Issue. so <br />rice. Nourse's ruling could set a <br />"This could have far-reaching precedent. <br />effects:" said attorney Ernie Both St. Lucie County and the <br />Rdaway. who represented the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority <br />31ne Port St. Lucie residents who have discussed establishing a, <br />sued Port St. Lucie for trying to ' centralized water syetent ' with, <br />• <br />!orce them to hookup to GDU's mandatory' hookups 'for those <br />water system when,they slrealtly with homes and business where <br />sad Individual wells. • ::gin the service •wasavailable. . • .••.:L <br />In his ruling issued last week,. "This (Nourse's rulingl • is <br />4ourse said that the city's law on ` something we may be consider- <br />uandatory hookups was not a ng down the road," Fort Pierce <br />'valid exercise., of. the city's Jtilities Director Harry Schiulte- <br />police power."' but was "a tette Bald: <br />3eavy-handed. unreasonable ef• <br />In the past two years, Port St. <br />tort to promote the economic .ucle had forced more than 300 <br />welfare of General Developm nt"• someowners. who already had. <br />Utilities.,, t••. ! wells, to hook up with GDU's <br />' Assistant City •Attorney Roger .ystem, charging them an aver- <br />Urr said that the City Council ige of $800 each just ln,lnitlal <br />will have to decide whether to tookup fees. <br />appeal Nourse's ruling. : • Curtis ..Morris, GDU Qlvislon <br />The law 'was"enacted"141110 nanager, said Nourse's ruling , <br />• early 1960s because it was not ould affect the company's long - <br />"economically feasible!' for GDU ange plans for water system <br />to extend Its water lines unless Zpansion. <br />the mandatory b"Itops vrere In, , <br />effect, he said. <br />Orr said the city had been <br />working toward a centralized <br />water system because It wanted <br />to assure that residents would . <br />have safe. potable water. <br />But Sidaway * a former assist- <br />ant Port St. Lucie attorney, said <br />that It was not Port St. Lucie's <br />responsibility to assure a safe <br />water supply. He said the county <br />health department can monitor <br />wells. just as it does city water <br />system. <br />Over the years. he said that <br />General Development Corp.. <br />which owns GDU. had an "inor- <br />dinate influence" over city offi. <br />cials. <br />"It's been a compa� - for <br />a long time; •.. It's <br />Si4O�Y said. <br />•:4 �7 <br />' •General •Develgpry,�enT� <br />Earns' -$22.'6 Milli- <br />eneral Develop 10 it?`'Corp:'']'i vA <br />-"��a•,3r;z1�R����Ir:@gB.t�'�+����bi7i%rihYr:;".` <br />lion, or $3.01 a share, for the:year <br />ended Dec. 31;1985. ' <br />• - Results for the year rgflect a non- <br />- ,recurring• .$2. 41MtlltoiiN te441i3 <br />chargg ($.1$ per share) on the.dis-f, <br />=w iositlOn` of •the`il ripany1i;*tiVgOl�`* •F ' <br />John • utility:. systerp Apr:t6f =first 5 <br />.quarter of 1935. <br />.• a y::•c ;:►, .. _ ..;..QEF, ••�••beR'3Fa+'�a'"�ty%��Ptj�i i <br />In 1984, the company earned#;; <br />$22.9 million or $3.05 per share.',:,'.`i <br />Total"1985 revenues were $346.6"� <br />'million compared with $335,7 mIl- `i <br />:. lion for the full year 190.,, y ;• <br />J .-;iP•�:rti%•••ry•``�:r;:,Ri•sM�„i''•i ..: •.4.':l;rc;!�1"�•�:1•�+�,7'•. <br />'Strong performances were re <br />ported in all of the operating divi. ,• <br />sions. Hr wesite sales were the <br />highest In history,'totaling $156.5; <br />millton.,.a.14•.p 994t_ i09 0 'e'ver <br />t=~t'Y�':�<$137:8'�miilIQ�'ii►�i$�5���4t$biig�� <br />sales were .$138.8's..'adIllon,: com- <br />pared with $153.1'fid lloie In'the <br />same period a year earlier, a.9 per- <br />cent:decrease• . : -;; . ':' ; •G ;1: , s y �. <br />1".t'Ti .a F''� �' M15'� �1 y''4• ' <br />Mr. Davenport emphasized that General Development's earnings <br />for 1985 were 22.6 million dollars. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if that is the development company <br />OW <br />