My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/26/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
3/26/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:13:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/26/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vista Gardens has built right down to the property line and all <br />the burden is falling on the Fultz side of the road. Sixth <br />Avenue, to which all of these properties have access, has <br />drainage problems. In Mrs. Fultz's case, she has a 10 -ft. <br />easement that runs through the Tropic Square Shopping Center and <br />where the asphalt drops off, it turns into a dirt road that goes <br />downhill to her house. During a heavy rainfall, there is a <br />torrent of water flowing down her driveway, and she is looking <br />forward to getting access onto Indian River Boulevard. During <br />negotiations with staff, Attorney Roddenberry understood that <br />access for Mrs. Fultz's property would not be a problem, but now <br />we are talking about a joint driveway along the Boulevard. <br />Administrator Wright stated that staff has no problem with <br />Mrs. Fultz applying for some type of access once the road is <br />built, but what we are saying today is that if we pay full price, <br />we don't want to guarantee access which would amount to paying in <br />excess of the value of the property. The access issue should be <br />handled on a needs basis. <br />Attorney Roddenberry did not see how guaranteeing them <br />access is paying more than fair market value, but Chairman <br />Scurlock stressed that it -would not be a problem if Mrs. Fultz or <br />her heirs continued to live there forever. However, if there was <br />a guaranteed access to the Boulevard, he would assume that <br />property could be marketed more easily than if it did not have <br />access. <br />Chairman Scurlock suggested guaranteeing access for single- <br />family residences only and approve one driveway for the White & <br />Fultz properties, which would be a right turn in and a right turn <br />off of the Boulevard. <br />Mrs. Fultz did not believe it was her fault that Vista <br />Properties built so near the line, and all she is asking for is <br />an access into her house from the Boulevard. <br />Chairman Scurlock advised Mrs. Fultz that was what the <br />County was going to do. <br />51 <br />MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK. 63 Fmu, 230 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.