Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />APS 9 X96' <br />BOOK 64 PA,F 194 <br />HOWELL/CHAPMAN_CONDEMNATION FEASIBILITY REVIEW <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/11/86: <br />TO:Indian River County Board DATE: FILE: <br />of County Commissioners March 11, 1986 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Charles P. Vitunac, HOWELL/CHAPMAN CONDEMNA- <br />County Attorney TION FEASIBILITY REVIEW <br />FROM*Bruceasarkett,� REFERENCES: <br />Assistant Coul!-,;.y Attorney <br />CONFIDENTIAL WORK PRODUCT IN ANTICIPATION OF TRIAL <br />This document is intended as a very brief review of <br />considerations relevant to the feasibility of condemnation <br />proceedings against the "Howell/Chapman" beachfront parcel of <br />property. <br />First, the February 18, 1986 correspondence from Butch <br />Horne, Senior Acquisition Review Agent, Department of Natural <br />Resources, indicates that if Indian River County commits to <br />acquire the Howell/Chapman parcel, the Department of Natural <br />Resources will commit to reserve the appraised value of the <br />property from the Save Our Coast fund for use in the acquisition <br />of the property. The actual amount DNR will commit to is <br />confidential, however I have asked Butch Horne to report to <br />Charlie Vitunac an approximate or "ballpark" figure upon which the <br />County can rely. <br />It is my opinion that based upon my conversations with <br />Butch Horne and his letter, the County can enter into a written <br />agreement with the Department to commit to spend up to the amount <br />of funds available according to the appraisals. <br />Section 127.01(2), Florida Statutes (1985), authorizes the <br />County to acquire by eminent domain lands for parks and other <br />recreational purposes; however, the party whose lands are sought <br />has the right to present an issue before the court as to the <br />necessity for the proposed taking, and the amount of land required <br />for the purpose soua t. Prior to having the County commit to <br />initiate eminent domain proceedings against the Howell/Chapman <br />parcel, reference should be made to the "Beach Access and <br />Development Plan" prepared by staff for the Board of County <br />Commissioners in 1982. That plan recommended purchase of <br />approximately 33.61 acres with 2,070 feet of ocean frontage 4 <br />miles north of State Road 510 along Highway A -1-A, which is the <br />approximate location of the Howell/Chapman parcel. Subsequent to <br />the issuance of the report, purchases have been made by the County <br />and by the State pursuant to the Save Our Coast program. A Court <br />faced with determining the issue of necessity in a condemnation <br />proceeding would be likely to compare the recommendations in the <br />1982 report with the subsequent acquisitions to determine, in <br />part, whether further acquisitions were necessary. <br />Finally, regardless of the findings of the 1982 report and <br />of the subsequent parcel acquisitions, a current update might <br />indicate necessity for additional ocean frontage. * Also, the <br />Howell/Chapman parcel lies between other.parcels already purchased <br />for beach recreation areas, a factor weighing toward granting a <br />taking. <br />6VIA <br />