Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />October 5, 2015 <br />Mr. Charles R Wilson. President <br />impact Fee Consultants <br />2001 9`11 Avenue, Suite 105 <br />Vero Beach, FL 32965 <br />Dear Mr. Wilson. <br />i have received your recent correspondence appealing the Community Development Director's <br />September 18, 2015 decision denying refund applications submitted for school impact fees paid <br />in 2008 (Attachment 5) it is my opinion as County Administrator that denial of those refund <br />applications was appropriate. With respect to specific issues raised in your letter, I offer the <br />following responses <br />• Appeal Reason 1: "No growth occurred in the time period making the expenditure <br />"necessary for new growth" impossible. Simply put no growth...no fee regardless of the <br />tine of the expenditure or the reason. As the first responsible officer it was required of <br />the Planning Director to consider more than the accounting and dates of fees but the <br />eligibility of such expenditures." <br />Response: With respect to impact fees, "growth" refers to development as indicated in <br />Impact Fee Ordinance sections 1000.03, 1000.04, and 1000.06. According to County <br />records, in 2008, 474 residential building pen -nits were issued in Unincorporated Indian <br />River County and Vero Beach alone. From 2008 — 2014, 2,269 residential permits were <br />issued (Attachment 1). Growth and development did occur during the subject time <br />period. That growth generated student demand, which was calculated in the form of <br />student generation rates and factored into the school impact fee rate, as technically <br />justified and presented in impact fee studies conducted for the county <br />• Appeal Reason 2 and 3: "Expenses claimed since 2008 had already been accounted for <br />by previous collections and a carryover of funds. Fees paid in 2008 cannot be used to <br />fund a deficit that existed prior to their collection. Funds are for future growth." <br />Response: With respect to both of these issues, there is no deficit being addressed <br />through impact fee rates or collection. This point was specifically addressed by Tindale <br />Oliver & Associates (the County's impact fee consultant) at the September 11, 2014 <br />School Board meeting that you attended (see workshop video at 10:51 AM and the 11.49 <br />AM marks). Since the County has adopted a Consumption -Based fee formula (see <br />response below for a more detailed explanation of what this means), impact fees are <br />collected continuously. Because school facility construction is substantial in nature, it is <br />1 <br />Attachment 4a <br />136 <br />