Laserfiche WebLink
� ® r <br />REQUEST FOR FORCED PAVING ASSESSMENT - SEBASTIAN GROVE ESTATES <br />Michael Miller, Chief, Current Development, made the <br />following presentation, noting that the applicant would be <br />required to pave up to about 6001, which is not reasonable. <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: March 31, 1986 FILE: <br />The Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: REQUEST BY MR. & MRS. <br />MCLAIN FOR APPROVAL OF <br />SUBJECT: A FORCED PAVING ASSESS - <br />Robert M. Kea ng CP MENT PETITION FOR <br />Planning & Development Director SEBASTIAN GROVE ESTATES <br />SUBDIVISION <br />FROM: Michael K. Miller M9M REFERENCES: McLain Agenda <br />Chief, Current Development MIKE <br />It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of April 16, 1986. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />Mr. & Mrs. McLain, owners of lot 9, Block 3 of Sebastian Grove <br />Estates, are requesting that the Board of County Commissioners <br />enact a forced paving assessment petition to bring the existing <br />roadways in Sebastian Grove Estates up to County standards. Randy <br />Mosby is acting as their agent in this request. <br />Sebastian Grove Estates was platted in 1958 and is located <br />immediately west of Old Dixie Highway and south of State Road 512. <br />The subdivision is located along the Sebastian City Limits, and 12 <br />of the 63 platted lots are within the City of Sebastian. Most of <br />the lots are 70 feet wide and 110 feet to 134 feet deep. The <br />subdivision was platted with 70 foot wide right-of-way widths that <br />exceed the current minimum width of 60 feet. <br />Although Old Dixie Highway is paved to a width of approximately 12 <br />feet (1/2 of the current required width of 22 feet) the pavement <br />surface is in generally good condition. The remainder of the <br />roadways within the subdivision consist of eithera marl surface <br />or severely deteriorated asphalt pavement. The asphalt that does <br />exist is -more similar to a paving base preparation than an actual <br />asphalt driving surface. The applicant contends that the entire <br />subdivision was paved at the time of platting and the pavement <br />deteriorated over time (letter attached). <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The site plan ordinance requires that paved roads serve all <br />proposed developments, and where a site abuts an existing street <br />with inadequate pavement width additional pavement may be required <br />(Sec. 23.3, (d) (1) ,d) . The Technical Review Committee has <br />consistently recommended that roadways providing access to <br />proposed developments be upgraded to minimum County standards. <br />Based on the above paving requirement, the development of the <br />subject property must include construction of approximately 600 <br />feet of 22 foot wide paving, extending to either State Road 512 or <br />Old Dixie Highway. <br />37 <br />APR. 16 1 � Boos F -w J7 <br />