My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/14/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
5/14/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:25:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/14/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M M <br />County would be helping only by arranging for the contracting of <br />reliable electricians. <br />Joe Powers, the first homeowner to be cited for violations, <br />suggested that instead of people being notified by registered <br />letter, ,that they be allowed to find their own solutions. If the <br />individual feels his unit is not safe, he could, on his own <br />accord, bring in a contractor who would go to the Building Dept. <br />and pull a permit to correct the problems. He urged the Board to <br />handle the inspection notices with compassion because many of the <br />residents are elderly and to receive an inspection letter would <br />upset them unduly. <br />Chairman Scurlock wondered if it would be better to have the <br />homeowners circulate the inspection information themselves, but <br />Commissioner Lyons did not feel we could live with that because <br />the County has been notified of these life-threatening <br />situations. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that notifying the presidents of <br />each of the homeowners associations for all three phases would be <br />okay if they all agree to put in writing that this was acceptable <br />to them and that they would accept the responsibility of <br />notifying the individual homeowners. He stressed that while the <br />County did not have any legal liability in these cases, the <br />County did have a moral responsibility to notify the people that <br />there might be life-threatening dangers in regard to their <br />electrical hookups. <br />Administrator Wright stated he would be glad to have two <br />notifications sent out, one now and one in November, since so <br />many of the residents are up north right now. <br />Commissioner Bird hoped that all the inspectors in the <br />Building Dept. would be consistent as to the interpretation of <br />the building code this time around. <br />Jerry Ashcraft, Lot 71 in Phase 1, noted that when the first <br />seven violations were found, the officers posted a notice on the <br />bulletin boards that there was a possibility of a defect in the <br />47 <br />MAV 14 1986 Boos �,�,� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.