My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/14/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
5/14/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:25:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/14/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the reality is that'you are going to be running the system many, <br />many hours, many, many days, on a 6 -day water week schedule. <br />After the turf matures, you can consider not turning on the <br />jockey pump during the peak periods. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that the bottom line is that we are <br />looking at the long term savings. <br />Mr. Greenfield also questioned the two pumping stations <br />mentioned, and Mr. Sheldon explained that the second pump station <br />mentioned was for comparison purposes only. Regarding the jockey <br />pump being on the general service rate for Rainbird and time of <br />use for Toro, he believed the Toro system is operating completely <br />within the 8 -hour envelope, which allows them to put out more <br />water in a shorter period of time. The fact that the jockey pump <br />for the Rainbird is on standard metering is.because that is the <br />only way their unit will work., A jockey pump is used to <br />stabilize the two larger pumps. <br />Mr. Greenfield questioned the prices of the pumps, but <br />Commissioner Bird and Administrator Wright pointed out that this <br />bid has been awarded already and the question today is operating <br />costs, not capital costs. <br />Hal Kilpatrick, President of Boynton Pump, could not <br />understand how the County could choose a system that is $24,000 <br />more expensive in capital costs than the one they are offering <br />(Rainbird). He urged the Board to rescind their decision of <br />three weeks ago when Toro was represented at the meeting and <br />Rainbird was not. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked the Commissioners if they wished to <br />reconsider their decision and the Commissioners confirmed their <br />decision to go with the Toro system and instructed Director Tommy <br />Thomas to order the system. <br />TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT <br />Commissioner Lyons reviewed the following Summary of Actions <br />dated 5/13/86: <br />51 <br />BOOK 6 F':;F 451 <br />MAY 14 1980 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.