Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />M <br />those surveys we have massive documentation which shows that in <br />some cases our trip rates are different than other counties. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed he can justify being at least as <br />stringent as the Regional Planning Council, but he could not see - <br />being less stringent. <br />t <br />Commissioner Lyons believed we must agree on a standard of <br />trip generation and have some uniformity throughout the region. <br />He noted that we are going to interphase with a project in St. <br />Lucie on 27th Avenue. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we need to adopt these standards <br />as part of this ordinance. <br />Public Works Director Davis stated that we do not, but <br />Commissioner Lyons felt we must adopt some standards some place. <br />Planner Boling explained the formula used to escrow for <br />impact and stated that the break point is if the project <br />generates over 100 daily trips. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired if they can recoup from other <br />benefiting property owners, and Director Davis stated they have <br />not gotten into the logistics of reimbursing for that. <br />Director Keating clarified that basically this ordinance <br />doesn't say how it will be done; it just says if the project is <br />large enough that it will create ap impact, a paved road should <br />be in place prior to the C.O. being issued. The funding is <br />determined on a case to case basis. <br />Discussion continued re standards, and the Oslo area, for <br />instance; those who benefit; assessment -on corner lots by square <br />footage rather than frontage; etc. <br />Director Davis felt not only do we have an advantage with <br />the escrow situation, but the person who has put up the escrow <br />has an incentive to pursue a petition because he has already paid <br />his money. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />There were none. <br />50 <br />BOOK 64 pmi c 644 <br />I <br />