6/18/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. AMEND ZONING CODE - SITE PLAN PAVING REQUIREMENTS (Cont'd.) Staff Planner Stan Boling made the following presentation: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: June 9, 1986 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: RECONSIDERATION OF SITE zeq SUBJECT: PLAN PAVING REQUIREMENTS Robert M. Keat ng, ICP ORDINANCE THROUGH: Michael K. Miller Mkp Chief, Current Development FROM: Stan Boling /�1�1 REFERENCES: Paving Staff Planner IBMIRD It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of June 18, 1986. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS At the June 4, 1986 regular Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board considered the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code to establish Section 23.3(d)(3): Paving Requirements. At the meeting the Board agreed on the substance of the proposed ordinance but withheld final adoption pending preparation of a provision to exempt existing establishments from paving provisions where planned improvements would not actually increase trip generations/attractions. Staff has now prepared an additional provision to the ordinance whereby, under certain conditions, paving provision requirements can be exempted. This revision is the underlined portion of the second page of the ordinance, shown on attachment #1. Attachment #2 is the revised ordinance in its entirety. ANALYSIS The revision allows the Public Works and Planning and Development directors to review an applicant's project to determine if site plan improvements will actually increase traffic to an existing establishment. Criteria are established whereby the applicant must prove that no increase in employees, deliveries, or patrons would result from such a project. An example of a project that could be exempted under such criteria would be an establishment proposing to build a garage or shelter for vehicles already used and parked out in the open on an existing developed site. The criteria have been drafted to limit the application of exemp- tions and maintain the purposes of the ordinance, namely to require paving provisions commensurate to increases in road impacts (added trips). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the ordinance establishing Section 23.3(d)(3): Paving Requirements. 45 BOOK 64