My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
6/18/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:02 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:33:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternative No. 3: Each county could contract with one <br />or more local attorneys to handle these "overload" cases <br />on a fixed fee or upon such other contractual arrange- <br />ment as may be agreed upon. Under such an arrangement, <br />it is assumed that the contracting attorneys would work <br />out of their own offices and provide their own support <br />facilities as may be required. my best estimate'would <br />be that this will involve approximately 1,000 cases during <br />this next year for martin County; over 2,600 cases for <br />St. Lucie County; and, over 1,200 cases for Indian River <br />County. At an estimated cost of approximately $350 per <br />case, the fiscal impact becomes virtually prohibitive. <br />Alternative No. 4: Employment by the county through <br />their County Attorney's Office of two attorneys in <br />Martin County; three attorneys in St. Lucie County; <br />and, two attorneys by Indian River County with these <br />attorneys assigned to work out of our offices would <br />provide an alternative solution. Law school grad- <br />uates not yet admitted to The Florida Bar can be util- <br />ized as long as they serve under our supervision and <br />can be employed at a salary of approximately $1,425 <br />per month. Attorneys recently admitted to the Bar <br />with relatively little experience can also be hired <br />at $1,890 per month. These are the salary ranges <br />that have currently been utilized by my office and <br />are generally considered to be reasonable. Each of <br />our offices involved currently have adequate space <br />to house these attorneys, and we would attempt to <br />provide the necessary support facilities including <br />secretarial services and necessary furniture and <br />equipment. Under this alternative, the total cost <br />to the counties would be between $34,200 and $45,360 <br />each for martin and Indian River County for this <br />next year, plus the necessary matching funds for <br />fringe benefits, etc., as are required for all coun- <br />ty employees. The cost for St. Lucie County for the <br />next 12 months would be between $51,300 and $68,040, <br />plus necessary matching funds. Should either of the <br />counties elect this alternative, we would continue to <br />assist by maintaining our current recruitment practices <br />in order to obtain the most qualified individuals avail- <br />able and would provide all necessary supervision. We <br />currently have one attorney in martin County, two at- <br />torneys in St. Lucie County, and two attorneys in In- <br />dian River County available for such employment and <br />have numerous other resumes from qualified individuals <br />pending at the present time. <br />Although Alternative No. 4 is obviously the most economical <br />solution to this long-range problem, the ultimate decision will <br />have to be made by each of the Boards of County Commissioners. <br />Should they choose not to take any action at this time, my only <br />alternative is to proceed under Alternative No. 2. <br />EHS:rb <br />61 BOOK 64 F',1r 755 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.