My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/2/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/2/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:02 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/02/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J U L 2 1966 BooK Fa F 894 <br />DISCUSSION RE PHASE II OF THE NEW JAIL WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR_, <br />ARCHITECT, AND STAFF <br />The Board reviewed the following letter dated 6/30/86: <br />WE I 111 11s, <br />I IKCC4E <br />F,A <br />Schopke Construction b Engineering, Inc. 5• <br />General Contracting and Engineering Services A <br />1620 Tangerine Sr, Melbourne, FL 32901, (305) 720-0354 <br />Lic. 12794 <br />June 30, 1986 <br />Indian River County <br />1840 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 <br />Attn: Mr. Sonny Dean, Director of General Services <br />Re: Indian River County Jail Phase II <br />Dear Mr. Dean: <br />As a follow-up to our conversation on Friday, June <br />27, 1986, please accept this letter as Schopke Construc- <br />tion's written confirmation that we fully intend to: <br />1) Enter into a contract with Indian -River County. <br />2) Complete the project in accordance with the <br />plans and specifications and in a timely manner. <br />In accordance with this contract between Indian River <br />County and Schopke Construction, the County will hold <br />Schopke Construction, not our subcontractors, liable for <br />timely completion in accordance with plans and specifi- <br />cations. With this requirement at point, it becomes <br />imperative that the General Contractor be able to control <br />his subcontractors with any and all legal means provided <br />him. A General Contractor cannot perform with a sub- <br />contractor that he has no control over whatsoever. This <br />is the case with Willo Products, in the fact that we as <br />General Contractor can foresee that our contractural <br />control will be severely limited if we should subcontract <br />with this subcontractor. <br />If anyone should be reading this letter that has work- <br />ed in a General Contractors office on a bid day then they <br />would know the fast pace and hectic atmosphere preceeding <br />all bids. It is a normal and common occurance that in <br />the days following a bid that a General Contractor will <br />need to make some revisions after has has had time to <br />evaluate all aspects of bids received. Even the County <br />reserves the right for a period of evaluation regarding <br />bids received. Are you maintaining that the County needs <br />several days to evaluate six (6) bids while only.allowing <br />the General Contractor the final minutes left after receiv- <br />ing better than 150 individual bids for everything from <br />Termite Treatment to Toilet Paper Dispensers? <br />t4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.