Laserfiche WebLink
FrJUL 15 7986 <br />Boa 65 FAcc 1S <br />Director Keating agreed and noted that back then staff hada <br />negative recommendation on the node. Staff's position now. <br />however, is that the concept of a neighborhood node, but a little <br />different from that the concept which was developed, would be <br />acceptable there because of the existing commercial development <br />and the planning for limited commercial there all during the <br />development of the project. Also, this request is for much fess <br />acreage than in 1983. <br />Attorney Henderson continued to emphasize that the project <br />was developed by Vista Properties in reliance on this node; the <br />20 acres was buffered on each side by the golf course, and with a <br />different development scheme, they might have developed differ- <br />ently, located the water plant, etc., accordingly. So, in a <br />sense, they gave up something in that regard. He claimed that <br />there has been consistency on the part of the developer all along <br />that that area was to be for commercial use and passed out the <br />following excerpt from their promotional literature to demon- <br />strate his point: <br />17 <br />