My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/15/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/15/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:02 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:42:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/15/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Alia emphasized the traffic stress this would create and <br />quoted an editorial from the PRESS JOURNAL urging denial of the <br />Vista Properties request for a zoning change. <br />Raymond Cox spoke next representing residents of Vista <br />Royale and focused his comments entirely on the traffic impact on <br />Vista Royale Boulevard. He noted that in 1983 they were told the <br />road capacity was 24,000, and now in 1986 suddenly there is the <br />capacity to handle additional daily trips, which he could not <br />comprehend. Mr. Cox did not believe U.S.I has changed except <br />that it is more hazardous than it was earlier. He further <br />believed the Planning staff completely disregarded impacts on the <br />main entrance and have told them that this simply becomes a site <br />plan question. Mr. Cox stressed that the only and main access <br />to these sites would be Vista Royale Boulevard; their community <br />has neither sidewalks nor bicycle paths and golt carts are driven <br />throughout the community; and it will be extremely hazardous for <br />the traffic impact to be increased. He urged the Board to deny <br />the application. <br />Harold Putnam, resident of Vista Royale and member of the <br />Florida Bar, noted that Vista Properties came in at the last <br />minute with some additional suggestions of uses they are willing <br />to prohibit, and he felt this should go back to the Planning <br />staff before the final decision is reached. He did not believe, <br />however, that their suggestions would prohibit either a gas <br />stati.on, a used car lot, or a convenience store, and he felt they <br />should accept these additional prohibitions . Mr.Putnam noted <br />that the Village Shops in Indian River Shores are limited to no <br />nighttime operation, and he believed whatever goes in this area <br />should have the same limitation. <br />Attorney Henderson explained that what they have done with <br />the restrictions is prohibit most of the uses they thought the <br />residents would object to, but they did reserve restaurants and <br />fuel service establishments. He felt everyone must remember that <br />there is no requirement that this entire 20 acres remain an <br />26 <br />JUL � � 19�� BOOK 65 F�1G� 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.