My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/16/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/16/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:02 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:43:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/16/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'JUL 16 1966 BOOK 6 PA"it 101 <br />r-- <br />1 <br />Pastor Wilson explained that their problem came about when <br />they came back to change their entire building at which time they <br />had to redraw their plans all over and restructure to meet the <br />ordinance. When they returned with these plans, they met up with <br />new staff people and a new set of ordinances, which required a <br />setback of 30' from each lot line. Their building will not fit <br />in with those new requirements. <br />Chairman Scurlock advised that he had indicated to Pastor <br />Wilson that we have a real problem setting a precedent, but he <br />thought there might be some relief if he could document that he <br />was in the process and could meet the current standards at the <br />time it was being considered and suggested that he present this <br />to the Board. <br />Planning Director Keating - that there has been a <br />significant dance as to now cnui ches and <br />special exception uses are treated in residential areas. These <br />changes have been put in to protect adjacent properties. His <br />suggestion was that the applicant be encouraged to go through the <br />process and file whatever appeals or variance requests are <br />necessary to take care of the situation. <br />Chairman Scurlock stated that, in his opinion, there is no <br />way the church can meet the requirements of the current <br />ordinance, and he felt the only possible relief would be that he" <br />was vested under the old ordinance; although he was not sure they <br />could have developed the project under the old ordinance. <br />Pastor Wilson advised that one of the things they were told <br />was that they did not have the application in at the time of the <br />old ordinance. They would have submitted the application but <br />were told to hold it because of the major changes they had. They <br />were stuck by holding onto their application and going back to <br />redraw their plans to what they thought were the specifications. <br />He noted that this is an existing building; the church is 80 <br />years old; and they are trying to add a fellowship hall to the <br />back of it. <br />54 <br />M M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.