7/23/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On June 26, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3 -to -0 to recommend approval of Alternative 2. ALTERNATIVES & A14ALYSIS Alternative 1 The first alternative designates all of the vacant and residential land in the R.D. Carter subdivision as RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre). The land located north of R.D. Carter subdivision and south of 35th Street would also be zoned RM -8. The existing commercial uses in the R.D. Carter subdivision which abut U.S. 1 would be zoned CG, General Commercial District, under this alternative, and the area between 35th Street and 37th Street which is adjacent to the hospital/commercial node would be zoned MED, Medical District. This alternative would require that the Comprehensive Plan be amended as follows: 1. Designate the residentially developed property in R.D. Carter subdivision and the land located north of the subdivision and south of 35th Street as MD -1; 2. Designate the commercial properties in the R.D. Carter subdivision as a commercial node or MXD area; 3. Enlarge the hospital/commercial node by approximately 6 acres to include the properties fronting U.S. 1 between 35th Street and 37th Street. Alternative 2 The second alternative is identical to the first alternative except that the land located north of the R.D. Carter subdivision and south of 35th Street would be zoned CL, Limited Commercial District. This would require the same land use designations as alternative 1 except for the property located north of the subdivision which would be designated as MXD or part of a commercial node. Establishing a 300 foot deep Mixed Use District on the east side of U.S. 1 between 35th Street and 30th Street (the southern boundary of the R.D. Carter Subdivision) would accommodate this alternative. Alternative 3 Alternative 3 would zone all of the land south of 35th Street as CG. Under this alternative, these properties could be designated as a Mixed -Use District. Regardless of which alternative is selected, the County must amend its Comprehensive Plan to establish land use designations for the area to be deannexed. Only then can zoning be established for these areas. Because of the twice a year limitation for amending the Comprehensive Plan, these proposed amendments cannot be considered until August. With State and regional reviews, the process will probably not be completed until November. Although final resolution of these issues will not be effected for several months, agreement on an alternative at this point will.provide property owners with an indication of final action. RECOMMENDATION The staff feels that the second alternative is the most realistic for this area based on the existing zoning in the City and the County. This alternative would provide for commercial or medical district zoning along U.S. 1 to encourage redevelopment. 16 BOOK 65 F,�,-UE 147