7/29/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUL 29 1986 _I BOOK 65 FADE 2 t O Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: 1. ALL OF TRACT 9, AND THOSE PARTS OF TRACTS 10, 15, AND 16, LYING EAST OF INTERSTATE 95, IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS_.OF INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY, FILED IN PLATBOOK 2, PAGE 25, PUBLIC''RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 5 9 8. 3 FEET OF TRACT 9 AND THE NORTH 5 9 8.3 FEET OF TRACT 10 LYING EAST OF THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 95 IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF TRACT 16, IN SECTION. 23, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST. INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION; LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Be changed from A-1, Agricultural District, to RS -1, Single -Family Residential District; and 2. THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF TRACT 16 IN SECTION 23,- TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER FARMS SUBDIVISION; LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Be changed from A-1, Agricultural District, to CG, General Commercial District. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Zoning Regulations. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on this 29th day of July, 1986. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By /� C Don C. Scurlock4J, Chairman It was noted that on Item # 7, the Miller & Hamilton request for rezoning, the staff had recommended denial; no objections to the denial have been expressed tonight; and there should be a Motion to clarify this. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commis- sioner Lyons, the Board unanimously (4-0) denied the rezoning from A-1 to CG requested by Miller and Hamilton as recommended by staff. (Item #7) 38