Laserfiche WebLink
f-� Pl <br />AUG 0 1963 <br />BOOK 65 PnE 475 <br />St. (.Matthews (-MmEonafty Cpap tilt chuhch <br />8550 64th ukehue T.O. Box 947 <br />gVabasso. Moxida 32970 <br />Leonard A. Wilson William C. Minnis <br />Pastor Chairman of Deacon Board <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Leonard A. Wilson, (St. Matthew Baptist Church) <br />RE: Statement of Information Regarding Site Plan <br />Date: August 5, 1986 <br />To the best of my ability, the following statements will <br />help to better understand why we are asking for our Site Plan <br />to be grandfathered in under previous required ordiances. ° <br />During the last week of April 1985 H.C.: Turner serving as <br />our cor_tr�ctor et: that time, submitted our site plan in the <br />presence of Mrs. Craven to planning and development for appli- <br />cation and approval. He recieved copies of general information <br />regarding requirements to be met, an application form and a <br />request for a letter stating the approved name of the contractor <br />in charge of our building project. <br />On May 8 and 14 these items were returned to Mrs. Craven <br />including copies of the building plans by me after approximately <br />two weeks I met with Mrs. Craven and learned that the site plan <br />didn't show enough about the area such as location of well, plants <br />and shrubbery, set back from road, and the fact that the area <br />being improved would include more than 5,000 sq. ft. The­.appli- <br />cation fee would be $350.00 which was ho -be held;until corrections <br />were made. And the need for storm water field to be considered <br />as to area. <br />During the middle of July or there about, I returned the plans <br />showing those corrections. Approximately two months or more <br />passed before we recieved the plan back. However, during that <br />time I spoke with Mrs. Craven by phone several times <br />(maybe 3 times) and was told that she had not gotten a chance to <br />discuss our plans with the Departments Director. <br />It was near the end of September when I -met with Mrs. Craven <br />at her office. The corrections needed were explained to be; <br />a 20 feet set back from each lot line north and south; Drainage <br />wells for water run off in designated parking lot area; More <br />written information on the plans to explain the project. <br />Due to some problems, the person drawing our initial draft <br />had, along with the fact that it was necessary to revise the <br />48 <br />