Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <br />LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION <br />525-010-29 <br />Production Support <br />OGC - 09/13 <br />e.a?&»•vt5f+c.-..'�' n'-"_: o-S.efiz•...-a7•y'.'.:-.' P.Z .'K .. <br />rre,,,�•-' :Y-SA"C S:i^.t'hl•y"Y- - F,O <br />SECTio4A (mMAlEjGRADEO) OVERAL&PERRMANGE $ z _ e: <br />,,,,,,, <br />COR <br />SE <br />1 The Local Agency demonstrated sufficient <br />Comments: <br />knowledge to complete the project in <br />accordance with Federal and/or State <br />requirements. <br />2 The Local Agency effectively identified and <br />Comments: <br />assessed problems and developed solutions <br />before those problems caused delays. <br />3 The project was completed free of errors, <br />Comments: <br />omissions or failures that could jeopardize <br />Federal or State participation. <br />4 The Local Agency used the required information <br />Comments: <br />system (EOC, LAPIT, etc.) for each applicable <br />phase. <br />,va9..#i o4. -:,N .+..'S' �4 9 A�'a�q d. --- Y" ' i. nL?i ` '4 - <br />�� <br />SectionWSco[e`v ¢ - <br />._ a <br />"°"WI+°z'i"-`Ye%ItT .i,.'ix'- �R=:S"�E�,i3.t=.�`:2.x-'.Zc'*n.a.w.3.. �.J-v �:,�-r. •€•.->:': .C}.,i}. '-�iSY'^(9. i'vw.': <br />SECTION;BMUST4BE'GRADED_,PROJECCOS;SCOPE-AND SCHEDULE ,,, <br />�1 l <br />SCORE: <br />1 The Local Agency presented a clear scope of <br />work and followed that scope in developing the <br />project. <br />Comments: <br />2 The project was advertised within the agreed- <br />upon schedule. <br />Comments: <br />3 The project was completed within the agreed- <br />upon schedule. <br />Comments: <br />4 The Local Agency showed consistent, <br />satisfactory progress in developing the project. <br />Comments: <br />e.+3< irol !. ::Zr sY"' .'u cT^, ✓`i..r+ry .. . '•3t' .i�[,'AL::S.�y: c^ =rF ".-- "3.£S, - .Z.y <br />�- -' -;< t.:z 3 <br />Section_B;Score:=��..�:���` � � 3 ��� r �< ":w�', <br />:�..._.....'-s._: : <br />.:Not Rated: <br />SEC tJON C..; (NiusTioE'GRADED) COMAAl1NICATION AND 000PERi4T10N ; ` 7 <br />SCARES <br />1 The Local Agency communicated effectively <br />Comments: <br />with the FDOT PM in order to keep the project <br />on budget and schedule. <br />2 The Local Agency consulted with the FDOT PM <br />Comments: <br />when issues affecting the scope, schedule or <br />budget arose. <br />n <br />c Vin"y+�a7` "'+x,�,- '_�' �r�-.Sc. "Fi,:;�� :�".' ..:d'0 •:Y+.],`.'=y'+-'-iryyr•,?..�ia....sr =r.t-" i:,'Y.^.. �:+11'v: }�> <br />SWion:C'Score `' '<«z ^ .._ , z.. �° `% b 4 3e <br />�; >e;'i <br />SECTION.D_ MUSTBEGRADED- � NVOI:C_ lNGs =ti=»�1:.. .':, GYaM. .,—�-_ °. se.'. "s,,• .,.- ''--'.'_-'v''�- w <br />...x„�CORE.,z,r. <br />1 Invoices were submitted timely <br />Comments: <br />2 Invoices provided sufficient detail to support <br />Comments: <br />requests for payment. <br />3 Costs billed to FDOT corresponded with work <br />accomplished as described in progress reports. <br />Comments: <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />