Laserfiche WebLink
for 71 off-street parking spaces, exceeding the minimum required <br />number of spaces. The drainage plan, landscape plan, and proposed <br />utilities design all meet County standards and have been approved. <br />The applicant -has agreed to install a 4 ft. wide public sidewalk, <br />grant a 22 ft. wide marginal access easement, and install the <br />majority of the marginal access road with the remainder of the <br />road to be escrowed. The surrounding land uses consist of the <br />Holiday Inn Motel to the east, a 7-11 store to the west, a mobile <br />home park to the south and the Days Inn Motel to the north, across <br />S.R. 60. <br />On August 7, 1986, Carter Associates, Inc. on behalf of their <br />clients formally appealed several conditions attached to the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission's approval of the First Inn Vero <br />site plan. The appealed conditions concern the median cut and <br />other required traffic improvements in front of the project. <br />Specifically, the appeal concerned conditions l.a. and 2.c. <br />These conditions being: <br />A <br />1. Prior to release of the site plan, the applicant shall: <br />a. agree to construct the S.R. 60 median improvements <br />recommended by the traffic engineer and- submit plans - <br />showing the closing of the 88th Avenue median cut and <br />the installation of a left -turn lane in" the S.R. 60 <br />median to service the Holiday Inn, the 7-11, and the <br />proposed site. These plans shall conform to the design <br />standards and criteria and be approved by the FDOT and <br />the County Public Works Department. This condition <br />shall be subject to FDOT approval of the project. <br />2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy;- the <br />applicant shall: <br />C. construct a westbound left -turn lane in the =S.R. 60 <br />median to service the site, and close the 88th Avenue <br />median cut. All construction shall -meet Coun_t_y and FDOT <br />design specifications. <br />The applicants' contention is that, because this project does not <br />exceed the 1,000 annual daily trips which would automatically <br />require the noted off-site improvements but only adds to the <br />existing traffic at this point of S.R. 60, the full cost of the <br />improvements should not be assessed to this project. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />As per County Code, whenever a project is expected to attract an <br />annual average of more than 1000 daily trips or 60 trips during <br />peak hours of operation on an annual average basis, the project <br />shall provide such off site improvements such as acceleration, <br />deceleration, and turning lanes as needed [Sec. 23.3(D)(4)(a)]. <br />The figures used to compute annual average daily and peak hour <br />trip rates for a proposed use are found in a manual released by <br />the the National Transportation Research Board located in <br />Washington, D.C. The averages used are based on national surveys <br />of traffic generated/attracted by specific uses. <br />In reviewing this site plan staff examined the traffic impact of <br />this project on the existing median design, both individually and <br />in combination with the existing uses. Though it was. found that <br />tis project did not attract 1,000 trips by itself, when combined <br />with the existing motel and convenience store, the total trips <br />greatly exceed 1,000. Further analysis of the median design at <br />this location revealed several additional problems. These are: <br />1. no deceleration lane for westbound left -turn traffic on a 55 <br />mph highway; <br />2. the current storage area for westbound vehicles wishing to <br />make left --turns is limited to one vehicle; <br />29 <br />SEP 2 Boor 65 F,,4,c 567 <br />L_ <br />