9/9/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r SEP 0 1986 BOOK 6 5 PA -C 654 they come off 9th Place rather than off 48th Avenue as he felt that would be more beneficial for him. Engineer Brooks noted that under the ordinance we are to assess those properties that do benefit. The water line will run" along the side of Mr. Browder's property, and the service will be available when he so chooses. Discussion continued as to exactly what Mr. Browder's problem was, and Engineer Brooks explained that his property is located on the corner of 48th Avenue and 9th Place and he would prefer to tie in when the line comes down 9th Place. Commissioner Bird pointed out that Mr. Browder has more frontage on 9th Place and the assessment might cost more, but Mr. Browder_argued that the installation to come across his property would cost more. Discussion continued at length, and Attorney Vitunac advised that if Mr. Browder has a physical ability to hook up, he will be charged. If he wants to hook up when the line goes down 9th Place, he will not be charged again, but he must pay now. - Chairman Scurlock noted that, in other words, the interpre- tation of the Attorney is that Mr. Browder benefits from the improvement, and, therefore, would have to be included in the assessment roll. It was determined that no one further wished to be heard. Discussion ensued regarding a Motion to approve the five recommendations in staff's memo, and Chairman Scurlock had a question in regard to No. 4, which is to execute the Scope of Engineering Services proposed by Masteller & Moler Associates. He has noticed in our engineering agreements in utilities that we do not have a provision requiring insurance, and in all the other public works engineering division we do. He felt it should be required that all the consultants and engineers who work for us have an appropriate amount they include for insurance so we are protected. 34