My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/22/2016
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
03/22/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2016 1:29:27 PM
Creation date
5/3/2016 1:29:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/22/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 2015 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 14-14979 <br /> RESPONSES TO COMPLETENESS COMMENTS <br /> FPL OKEECHOBEE CLEAN ENERGY CENTER SiTE CERTIFICATION APPLICATION <br /> As shown oil Figure 4 5-1, the average waste water flow is 1,333 gpm (1 92 MGD), the nlax month <br /> average flow is 1,617 gpm (2.33 MGD) and the peak now is 6,025 gpin (8 68 MGD) <br /> IRC-8. Figure 8 under Appendix 10.9 should be extended to show the impacts of the l- foot <br /> drawdown contour. <br /> RESPONSE: The 1-foot contour on Figure 8 illustrates the cumulative impact of all users in the <br /> model area, which extends model-wide beyond the area of OCEC Unit 1 Figure 7 shows the <br /> drawdown impact due to OCEC withdrawals out to the 0 5-foot contour <br /> IRC-9. Also, if the 1-foot drawdown contour is to extend beyond the ECFS groundwater model, <br /> is it accurate to only use the subject model or should it be combined with the SEC model (which <br /> covers the east portion of Indian River County)? <br /> RESPONSE: The impact of OCEC Unit 1 is well within the boundaries of the ECFS model. There <br /> is no need to combine the ECFS and the SEC models to evaluate the impacts of the Project; in <br /> accordance with coordination between FPL and SJRWMD. <br /> TRC-10. When firing 1JLSD oil, when natural gas is not used, emissions of NOx will be <br /> controlled using water injection and SCR. How much additional water (process or treated) will <br /> be used in this effort? <br /> RESPONSE: The amount of water required for NOx control when ultra-low distillate oil (ULSD) is <br /> used depends upon the load of die combustion turbine (CT) and ambient temperature At an ambient <br /> temperature of 75° F. which is about equivalent to the annual average, approximately 470 <br /> gallons/minute is required for each CT at 100 percent load ULSD will only be used as a backup fuel, <br /> limited to no more than 500 hours/year per CT The water use when using ULSD for 500 (tours per <br /> year is included in the water balance shown in Figure 4 5-1 <br /> IRC-11. "A supplemental SCA describing the solar facility layout, engineering design, drainage <br /> system, and construction specifications would be submitted prior to development of the future <br /> solar generation area of the Site." How much process/treated Rater, if any, will be used in the <br /> future solar panel array for cooling? if water will be used, will this future additional water be <br /> factored into the CUP allocation being requested now? <br /> RESPONSE: FPL is not seeking a separate consumptive use permit for the OCEC Project. Rather, <br /> pursuant to Section 403 511(1), Florida Statutes, the certification will constitute "the sole license of <br /> E the state" for the construction and operation of the plant and associated facilities. Impacts, including <br /> potential water use associated with potential future solar generation on the Site, would be addressed <br /> in a supplemental site certification application under Section 403 517, Florida Statutes. Please note, <br /> however, that solar photovoltaic technology does not require cooling water No process/treated water <br /> will be used in the potential future solar facility for cooling. <br /> i <br /> IRC-12. Cooling Towers <br /> a) Cooling tower bactericides used in controlling microbial growth in the draft cooling tower <br /> should be evaluated to take into account drift that may affect neighbors, cattle, drivers on <br /> SR60,and visitors to the Fort Drum conservation area. <br /> b) Cooling towers, evaporative condensers, and fluid coolers use a fan to move air through a <br /> recirculated water system. This allows a considerable amount of water vapor and sometimes <br /> 12 Attachment 3 <br /> 213 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.