My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/28/2015
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
01/28/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2018 11:20:15 AM
Creation date
5/11/2016 10:55:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/28/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
****PRELIMINARY AND TENTATIVE FINDINGS**** <br />General Counsel have also received benefits such as additional annual leave and contributions to retirement health <br />savings accounts that are not afforded to other FMPA employees. While the Board has documented this process for <br />the CEO through the establishment of a contract and associated amendments, no contract has been established for <br />the General Counsel; rather, the General Counsel's compensation package has been established pursuant to a series of <br />Board -approved motions spread over several years, making it difficult to identify all benefits provided. For example, <br />the General Counsel's annual leave is not subject to the cap established for regular employees in the Manual, however, <br />although requested, FMPA personnel did not provide us Board minutes evidencing the Board action that exempted <br />the General Counsel from caps on annual leave accrual. While Board minutes from September 17, 2010, clearly <br />indicate that the Board was aware that the General Counsel could earn unlimited annual leave, lack of a contract <br />enumerating compensation provisions creates difficulty in verifying that the General Counsel's pay and benefits are in <br />accordance with the Board's intent and increases the risk of error due to inability to locate Board motions establishing <br />specific aspects of salary and benefits and misinterpretation of same. <br />Recommendation: The FMPA should enter into a contract with the General Counsel encompassing all <br />Board -approved compensation arrangements cumulatively provided to the General Counsel and implement <br />any further compensation changes as contract amendments. <br />Finding No. 7: Severance Pay and Benefits <br />As indicated in finding No. 5, the Board sets the CEO's compensation package based upon a <br />Board -approved contract and amendments thereto. Paragraph 3(d) of the contract in effect as of September 30, 2014, <br />indicated that the CEO would receive six months of base salary if terminated for cause. Under these contract <br />provisions, if the CEO was terminated with cause as of September 30, 2014, the CEO would have received a one-time <br />payout equal to 50 percent of his annual salary, totaling $137,500. Contract provisions also indicate that certain <br />healthcare benefits are to be retained after termination for a certain number of months based upon the termination <br />date. The contract provides that the FMPA will either pay for, or reimburse, the CEO's health insurance premiums <br />for life and fund the CEO's health reimbursement account (HRA) for life. The current annual costs of health <br />insurance and HRA contributions, to be provided for life, are $4,946 and $9,400, respectively. <br />While including severance compensation and postretirement benefits in the CEO's employment contract for <br />termination without cause may serve a valid business purpose, it is not apparent why the FMPA would extend these <br />provisions to instances in which the CEO is terminated for cause. <br />Recommendation: The FMPA should consider amending the CEO's contract to remove any severance <br />compensation and postretirement benefits associated with termination for cause. <br />Procurement of Goods and Services <br />Finding No. 8: Questioned Expenditures <br />Expenditures of public funds must be shown to be authorized by applicable law or resolution; reasonable in the <br />circumstances and necessary to the accomplishment of authorized purposes of the governmental unit; and in pursuit <br />of a public, rather than a private, purpose. The Attorney General has indicated on numerous occasions that <br />documentation of an expenditure in sufficient detail to establish the authorized public purpose served, and how that <br />17 <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.