My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/30/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
9/30/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:05:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/30/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) authorized <br />staff to proceed with condemnation, the county to pay <br />the cost of condemnation, which is to be included in the <br />total assessment roll, based on the County paying 75% and <br />the residents 25%. <br />SHERIFF'S CAD SYSTEM <br />A. Approval to Join Consortium <br />The Board reviewed the following letters from Don Hylton, <br />Director of Information Systems, and from Sheriff Dobeck: <br />-7 �__ <br />�. . <br />FREDA WRIGHT <br />CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER_ <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />(305) 567.8000 P. O. BOX 1028 <br />VERO BEACH - FLORIDA <br />32961-1028 <br />` c n?TI T?Cyd LIS <br />September 22, 1986+. T• .! <br />Cc,ni r: ssia ers <br />The Hon. Patrick B. Lyons - 'fil'''let E„s FF° e -- <br />County Commissioner `� F. S — <br />1840 25th Street -- <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 V <br />r�rcC'Cr <br />In re: Evaluation of C.A.D. Consortium ^`theC,._,,t,�.,,-_::Ttt••J <br />Dear Mr. Lyons: tJ <br />I would like to qualify my remarks by saying I have no personal interest in what <br />the Sheriff decides to do in his quest for more automation of the functions of <br />his office. I whole heartedly agree with him that I have very little expertise <br />in the functions of law enforcement. I also want it to be made very clear that <br />I had no say in the decision of the County Commission to send me to St. Louis <br />County to evaluate the C.A.D. system that the Sheriff feels is the one for his <br />operation. What will follow will be an analysis of what I found based solely on <br />the data processing aspects of the system in question. It will be totally ob- <br />jective. With this out of the way, I will continue with my report. <br />In the days just prior to my going out to St. Louis County alot of questions were <br />raised about the feasibility of Indian River County spending $32,000.00 to join <br />the consortium that will try to produce a very comprehensive C.A.D. system to be <br />available to all members of the consortium. I have built this report around those <br />questions and the answers I received. <br />97 <br />SEP 3 0 1986 Boa 65 v,, -U-. 932 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.