Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 2 11986 <br />BOOK <br />66 F�,UE145 - -- <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />Dennis Zambataro, an agent for Frank Baratta, the owner, is <br />requesting to amend the Comprehensive Plan by redesignating 2.5 <br />acres located on the south side of 17th Street and the west side <br />of 6th Avenue from -MD -2, Medium -Density Residential 2 (up to 10 <br />units/acre), to Commercial. <br />On September 11, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />5 -to -0 to recommend that this request be denied. They indicated <br />that they did not feel that this area is suitable for commercial <br />development but is suitable for -professional offices. They <br />indicated that the County may need to consider a new professional <br />office zoning district. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli- <br />cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip- <br />tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur' - <br />rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and <br />utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ- <br />mental quality. <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property is undeveloped. North of the subject <br />property, across 17th Street, are multiple -family residences <br />zoned RM -10. West of the subject property are three <br />single-family residences zoned RM -10, an office building zoned <br />OCR, Office Commercial and Residential District (up to 6 <br />units/acre), and a new car sales facility, service station and <br />"motel zoned CG, General Commercial District. South of the <br />subject property are single-family residences zoned RM -10. East <br />of the subject property, across 6th Avenue, are single-family <br />residences zoned RM -10. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan generally designates the subject property <br />and all of the land around it as MD -2, Medium -Density Residential <br />2 (up to 10 units/acre). However, in 1985 the County amended the <br />definition of the U.S. 1 Commercial Corridor. Originally <br />anticipated to extend exactly 600 feet east of the east <br />right-of-way line of U.S. 1, the revised definition states that <br />the eastern boundary of the corridor is flexible being roughly <br />600 feet east of the east right-of-way line of U.S. 1. Moreover, <br />this amendment allowed the boundary to be extended up to 800 feet <br />east of U.S. 1 if the property could meet one of three <br />conditions. One of those conditions was if the property abutted <br />commercially -zoned property and had frontage on an arterial <br />street. The subject property does abut commercially -zoned <br />property to the west and has frontage on an arterial street (17th <br />Street). However, only the west 100 feet of the subject property <br />lies within 800 feet of U.S. 1. <br />The Planning Department is concerned -with the increasing pressure <br />to strip zone arterial streets in the County for commercial <br />development which is contrary to the policies of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and damages the effectiveness of the arterial. <br />streets in moving traffic. While this pressure has been evident <br />along U.S. 1, State Road 60, and Oslo Road in the past, the <br />County will see considerable interest in strip commercial <br />development along 17th Street and the Indian River Boulevard <br />Extensions with spillovers onto 12th street and 8th Street in the <br />near future. This pressure resulted in property on the south <br />side of 17th Street approximately one-quarter mile east of the <br />subject property being annexed by the City of Vero Beach and <br />being rezoned to the City's Professional Office District. <br />34 <br />