10/21/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, that the Board adopt Ordinance 86-69, rezoning the area east of the Lateral G Canal from RS -6 to RS -3; and authorize staff to transmit to the State the proposed land use amendment of LD -2 to LD -1. Under discussion, Mr. Shearer confirmed that the Board has the ability to change the zoning today, but cannot adopt a land use amendment prior to the State's 90 -day review. Commissioner Lyons commented that as far as he was concerned, a new set of•facts has been presented today and he now believed he might have made a bad decision in voting against staff's recommendation on July 23rd. However, it is up to the Board to protect the rights of everyone, and he felt we should keep in mind that the people who live in that area purchased their property at LD -2 and should not have expected that area to be downzoned. While he was against the overall redoing of this, he certainly would be glad to consider a compromise situation, if - there is a compromise to try to satisfy both the people who live there and those who have their money invested in property there. Commissioner Wodtke felt it was going to be very difficult for the Board to make everyone happy. He suggested that the Board approve a land use amendment that would bring that LD -1 across the canal and extend it to all those single-family residences who want to maintain the single family residential, including the Tucker/Wallace 10 acres and extend the 3 upa across • to Doug Sousa's property. He felt that would include everyone other than the one property owner who is south of Winter Beach Road that had a request to downzone to 3 upa. Commissioner Wodtke stressed that -LD -2 on the Comp Plan is simply -a - designation for up to 6 upa and does not necessarily mean that it will develop at 6 upa. He asked if staff would have much of a problem to do the extension he suggested to bring that LD -1 51 BOOK ["�1, 6' OCT 11986 9