Laserfiche WebLink
applied to the Utilities Department. He felt he was unfairly <br />informed of the fees he would have to pay. <br />Director Pinto confirmed the truth of Mr. Vatland's. <br />statements and agreed that he is a man of integrity in the <br />community, but pointed out that Mr. Vatland's professional <br />architect was there and he certainly understood exactly what the <br />fees and negotiations represented. Mr. Pinto stressed that his <br />department cannot and does not ever talk about fees for other <br />functions in the county. He understood Mr. Vatland's misinter- <br />pretation, but believed that is why people hire professionals and <br />he felt his professional may have let him down. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if we could say that if this project <br />comes in under the construction cost that it be revisited because <br />of the misunderstanding, and Director Pinto had no problem with <br />that so long as it does not set a precedent. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if we have any legal right to <br />waive the traffic impact fee, and Attorney Vitunac did not <br />believe so. When a project has any affect on our traffic system, <br />we don't waive the fees for anyone, not even ourselves. <br />Co—missione% Wodtke felt if there should be a change in the <br />.construction costs, possibly it could be a legitimate reason to <br />authorize a refund up to about $1,200. <br />Director Pinto advised that they are usually pretty close on <br />estimating costs, but there has been some change in the design so <br />there is some possibility the cost could change. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized <br />to staff to refund Mr. Vatland up to the amount of <br />$1,200 in the event there is a lesser construction <br />cost than estimated. <br />PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION QUORUM REQUIREMENTS <br />Planning Director Keating made the staff presentation: <br />,::�.�1VdY 66 BOOK. F.r4Ut 266 <br />