Laserfiche WebLink
NOV 4 198 <br />BOOK 66 o J . 306 <br />Attorney Stewart, representing Gordon Nutt, stated the <br />difference would amount to about 51. He explained that in the <br />or-iginal site plan there was a monolithic building, the whole <br />flat side of which was on the CCCL. The revised site plan, which <br />has been approved, has more of a "W" shaped building, and only <br />the points of the "W" on the east side of the building are now <br />30' back. The mass of the building has been moved to the west <br />considerably further than 301. <br />Chairman"Scurlock asked staff if the new site plan is a <br />better plan for the county, and Director Keating did feel it is a <br />better plan and will present a better image. He further noted <br />that the plan Mr. Nutt has now is not substantially different <br />from what he could have done back in 1981 because the bottom of <br />the height measurement then was from .the final finished grade in <br />the front of the building, which meant you could berm up the <br />front of the building and measure from the top of the berm to the <br />top of the building rather than from the average natural grade of <br />the site. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the average natural grade is <br />measured from the top of the dune line to A -1-A or just where the <br />building structure is going to be, and Director Keating stated <br />that it is not clearly defined in the ordinance, but it has been <br />his decision that we can measure from where the building is going <br />-to be. <br />Commissioner Wodtke had a concern about the following letter <br />from Fire Chief Allen but realized this ladder truck was <br />requested in their budget: <br />24 <br />s � � <br />