Laserfiche WebLink
Director Pinto stated his recommendation would be that until <br />such time as there is adequate capacity, the use of the fire <br />hydrants be eliminated, but the problem is that the franchise <br />requires 'fire flow. The franchise could be amended, but actually <br />he disagrees with putting this in a franchise anyway. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired how the increased rates would <br />compare with existing county rates, and Franchise Manager Lisa <br />Abernethy advised that foranaverage use of 3,000 gallons of <br />water and wastewater per month, the total county cost would be <br />$25.08. For Breezy Village, it would total $40.78 with the 120 <br />increase, or about $15.00 higher. <br />Commissioner Bird believed the answer is the additional cost <br />of operating a small system as opposed to the county system, and <br />Director Pinto felt it is very easy to comprehend when you look <br />at 85 customers because every $85.00 spent represents a dollar <br />per customer. He advised that this is not the most expensive <br />system; actually General Development in Port St. Lucie, which has <br />a much larger customer base, is higher and so are two in Brevard <br />County. He felt the problem is that for that cost you would like <br />to have the very best water you can possibly drink, and the <br />Breeze Village residents are getting the most minimum quality of <br />water that will meet the criteria of EPA. <br />Chairman Scurlock again emphasized that this particular case <br />is based on an 1983 test year, and if the company filed for a <br />tariff based on a more current year, the rates could be <br />significantly higher. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />Francis Calamita, 9810 61st Terrace, commented that staff <br />says the utility company complied with the previous order, but he <br />believed it called for a dual chlorinator and he did not think <br />they have one, which is one reason the water is not palatable._ <br />He also felt the operator said it was a 1/50 ratio and not 1/10, <br />which is what it is supposed to be. <br />11 BOOK F'ij 5�4� <br />NOV 12 1986 <br />