My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/2/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
12/2/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:18:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/02/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
one before the Planning 6 Zoning Commission and one before this <br />Board. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if Mrs. Forbes wished the Board to <br />pursue downzoning to RS -3, and then pursue further reducing the <br />zoning, and she confirmed that she did because there are two huge <br />parcels left on the street that could be developed into PRDs, and <br />there already is one potential PRD. <br />Dr. Robert Vinson stressed that he has said from the <br />beginning that we should have one acre lots.on Rosewood Road. He <br />did not want to see PRDs take over and have them put up security <br />walls and destroy the natural beauty of this area. He did not <br />see any difference in RS -6 and RS -3 because with either they will <br />have increased traffic and increased gated communities, which is <br />not the nature of Rosewood, and he felt RS -6 actually is better <br />yecause it at least requires street lights and bike paths. <br />Margery Young, 1485 50th Court,'noted that the residents are <br />very proud of their street, but it seems their efforts to keep it <br />beautiful are being exploited by developers. Mrs. Young believed <br />there are many homes and condos for sale all over the city and <br />urged that the Board keep their area on Rosewood Road the way it <br />is and has been over the years. <br />George Beuttell, 5480 Rosewood Road, noted that he has lived <br />at that address for ten years and grew up on Rosewood Road. He <br />spoke on behalf of his mother who owns the largest piece of <br />property being affected by the new zoning and informed the Board <br />that while they are for the downzoning, they do not feel it is <br />appropriate to downzone theirs to RS -1 if the properties on the <br />other side of the road remain RS -3. Mr. Beuttell stated that <br />they have no intentions of developing but they would like to <br />reserve the right to be able to develop as those property owners _ y <br />surrounding them have been able to. Conversely, if the Board <br />were to rezone the Ralmar property and the south side of Rosewood <br />to R-1, they would be glad to go along with anything of that <br />Di9�6 23 BOOK 6 PA,E 54n7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.