My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/9/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
12/9/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:19:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/09/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County Attorney Vitunac emphasized that because of the <br />seriousness of violating the Sunshine Law, he is recommending <br />that people sign the acknowledgement that they have read and <br />understand "Government in the Sunshine Manual." <br />Chairman Scurlock emphasized that the State Attorney's <br />Office met in secret and decided that the City of Vero Beach has <br />a problem and somehow the County got included without their doing <br />any research into how we appoint or how we approach this. He <br />wondered why Sebastian, Indian River Shores and the Town of <br />Orchid were not given the message. <br />Commissioner Bowman did not believe the intent of the <br />Sunshine Law was to prohibit the exchange of ideas or <br />information, but rather to prohibit the people sitting on the - <br />same boards to lobby each other and cut deals. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that ideas can be exchanged by <br />written correspondence through the Clerk's Office, but the law <br />does prohibit telephone calls or conversations between any two <br />members of the same board, even if they are not lobbying or <br />twisting arms. The intent of the law is that the decision making <br />process must occur here on this dais in these Chambers. <br />Chairman Scurlock recalled that when the State conducted a <br />survey two years ago on whether or not public officials <br />understood the Sunshine Law, the result, basically, was "NO", and <br />out of that study came recommendations that the law be modified <br />to some extent. One modification is the change in the County <br />Attorney's relationship with the Board and being able to caucus <br />re negotiations with labor unions. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired about members standing in the <br />halls talking to each other and attending seminars together. <br />Attorney Vitunac stated that conversation in the hall or <br />during travel to conventions or seminars must be limited to other <br />topics such as sports or the weather. <br />35 <br />BOOK. �r��r. 1° <br />®EC 9 1986 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.