Laserfiche WebLink
canal right up to that line. He felt they could work with the <br />61.7 ft., but was rather concerned that while this was an unique <br />experience, it might set a precedent on our thoroughfare map. <br />Planning & Development Director Robert Keating felt that if <br />we went this route, there would be many appeals to the Planning & <br />Zoning Commission for unique circumstances. <br />Mr. Massey reiterated that if it is found that the County <br />did not accept that donation back in 1979, the DOC may own that <br />61.7 ft. from Kings Highway up to the dormitory. <br />Murdock Shaw, architectural supervisor with the DOC, stated <br />that they were not even aware until recently that an attempt had <br />been made to dedicate that 61.7 ft.to the County. He stressed <br />that the State is agreeable to working with the County, as far as <br />providing an access road in that area is concerned; however, they <br />would like something more definite that involves all the <br />landowners to the east and west and also the Drainage District <br />before they just arbitrarily agree to give 80 ft. or 61.7 ft. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt we need to get the issue resolved and <br />personally he would like to have 61.7 feet from Kings Highway all <br />the way up to 16th Street. <br />Commissioner Bird wanted to see that also, and if we find <br />that the right-of-way has been conveyed to the DOC, we need to <br />get it back. <br />Director Keating advised that all that can be required at <br />this point is the dedication of the portion of the right-of-way <br />on the dormitory site prior to site plan approval, and then when <br />the actual proposal for the Mueller Center comes in for <br />development, we can require the other 61.7 ft. <br />Commissioner Bird believed that since there wasn't any money <br />exchanged between the State and the college, that the State <br />should not have any concerns about dedicating the 61.7 ft. back <br />to the County. <br />60 <br />