1/20/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,SAN 2,Q 197 J BUUK 6�l ouL 40 Commissioner Bowman brought up Provision b. "All outdoor lighting shall be adequately shielded in order to prevent reflection onto adjacent properties." She advised that she would like to add to this "or onto the turtle nesting areas." After they were annexed, they would have to comply anyway. Attorney Moss had no objection to that provision or to complying with the Town's ordinance. Joe Dorsky, City Manager of Indian River Shores, advised that if this property were now part of Indian River Shores, the Town probably would not allow the club to be built for the use of another city; however, the Town recognizes that the property is not in Indian River Shores and wishes to express its concerns for the Board to consider. He believed the Town's concerns are the same as those expressed by the Board, i.e., the parking problem, the possible overflow onto A -1-A, the jurisdictional problem with enforcement if the property were to remain in the county. Mr. Dorsky confirmed that Grand Harbor has agreed to be annexed and this would remove the jurisdictional problem. He disagreed with the County's planners who indicated an average traffic flow of 300 trips daily and advised their traffic engineer felt the peak could be 3 to 5 times that. Mr. Dorsky reported that they do have provisions in place to three lane A -1-A and provide decel- eration lanes from the north boundary of the Town (Bay Tree) down to Indian Trails, and he felt it would help solve turning and intersection problems if the three-laning were extended Chairman Scurlock commented that apparently their agreement to annex isn't something under consideration by this Board, and Attorney Vitunac confirmed the Board must deal with this under the assumption that the property will remain in the county forever. Attorney Moss advised that they will be glad to set aside three acres across the street for parking if the Board and the Town so desire. 40