Laserfiche WebLink
FEED 2 M87 <br />BOOK 67 r.'�vr. � I/� <br />of solids train of the North Subregional facility. The benefit of <br />this technology is two -fold. First, by adding the waste into the <br />solids train of the wastewater facility, the associated 900 load <br />would not be exerted on the liquid treatment portion, thus <br />maintaining liquid plant capacity. Second, capital and operating <br />costs would be reduced due to economies of scale. <br />o Belt filter press dewatering at the North Subregional facility <br />along with its associated polymer conditioning. <br />o Disposal of sludge cake at the County landfill facility. <br />o Odor control equipment is also recommended to be provided. A "wet <br />I scrubber" type system, Is recommended. " <br />l_ <br />Daniel Anderson came before the Board to make the presenta- <br />tion on the rate study and the finances involved. Mr. Anderson <br />informed the Board that the recommended method of cost recovery <br />is a combination of a user charge system levied upon properties <br />generating septage and/or grease wastes and an impact fee levied <br />upon new septic tanks and grease traps. The Solid waste System <br />Rate Study recommends: <br />`t,that the Sanitary Landfill <br />j Enterprise Fund be expanded and modified to be the Solid Waste Enterprise <br />Fund. The expanded enterprise fund is intended to encompass: (1) the <br />landfill; (2) the five convenience centers; (3) the septage and grease <br />receiving facility; (4) thickened wastewater sludge receiving facility; <br />and, (5) the solids treatment facility at the Gifford North Subregional <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant along with the conveyance system of trucks used <br />to haul treated solids residuals and grease wastes to the landfill for <br />disposal. The fee structure must reflect the costs incurred on behalf of <br />the septage and grease wastes from the appropriate Solid Waste Enterprise <br />Fund components.' <br />Charts setting out the recommended cost recovery and <br />calculation of the surcharge are as follows: <br />14 <br />