2/2/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FEED 2 M87 BOOK 67 r.'�vr. � I/� of solids train of the North Subregional facility. The benefit of this technology is two -fold. First, by adding the waste into the solids train of the wastewater facility, the associated 900 load would not be exerted on the liquid treatment portion, thus maintaining liquid plant capacity. Second, capital and operating costs would be reduced due to economies of scale. o Belt filter press dewatering at the North Subregional facility along with its associated polymer conditioning. o Disposal of sludge cake at the County landfill facility. o Odor control equipment is also recommended to be provided. A "wet I scrubber" type system, Is recommended. " l_ Daniel Anderson came before the Board to make the presenta- tion on the rate study and the finances involved. Mr. Anderson informed the Board that the recommended method of cost recovery is a combination of a user charge system levied upon properties generating septage and/or grease wastes and an impact fee levied upon new septic tanks and grease traps. The Solid waste System Rate Study recommends: `t,that the Sanitary Landfill j Enterprise Fund be expanded and modified to be the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund. The expanded enterprise fund is intended to encompass: (1) the landfill; (2) the five convenience centers; (3) the septage and grease receiving facility; (4) thickened wastewater sludge receiving facility; and, (5) the solids treatment facility at the Gifford North Subregional Wastewater Treatment Plant along with the conveyance system of trucks used to haul treated solids residuals and grease wastes to the landfill for disposal. The fee structure must reflect the costs incurred on behalf of the septage and grease wastes from the appropriate Solid Waste Enterprise Fund components.' Charts setting out the recommended cost recovery and calculation of the surcharge are as follows: 14