My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/2/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
2/2/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Called Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/02/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
dry out and also there is an existing septage area which is <br />unlined. Although the monitoring wells have not indicated any <br />environmental problems re contamination of ground water so far, <br />they have recommended that the dried out septage lagoons be <br />excavated and that material put back into the landfill space. As <br />to taking care of septage over the short term, Mr. Hauser advised <br />that they recommend going into segment II and lining an area to <br />use for septage until further facilities can be built. This <br />would fit in with the overall plan. Mr. Hauser emphasized that <br />the landfill site is a good site and very developable. <br />Mr. Hauser then reviewed their recommendation for a larger <br />pit burner because too much brush is going into the landfill. As <br />to having an air curtain incinerator in the north county, they <br />prefer a site where the county can exercise the most control and <br />recommend that the one at the present landfill be utilized to its <br />maximum. They do feel locating one in the north county can be <br />looked at, but would recommend it be done under county control. <br />Chairman Scurlock inquired about the potential of deep well <br />injection and whether there is excess capacity in the existing <br />deep well. <br />Mr. Hauser noted that would be a potential for leachate <br />disposal. There are a number of alternatives that could be <br />pursued, and they need to investigate this a little further. The <br />alternatives include collecting the leachate and circulating it <br />back on the landfill, which has been done quite successfully. <br />Mr. Hauser then reviewed Table 2-8 summarizing the costs <br />associated with the solid waste system capital improvements <br />program and Figure 10-1 outlining an 18 month program, which <br />tables are as follows: <br />9 <br />BOOK. b iJ 1 r "E 1-73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.