Laserfiche WebLink
'1 1987 <br />BOOK 6 7, G � �'. 313 <br />and he did not see the need for.it. Mr. Grimm pointed out that <br />when Mrs. Reeves obtained rezoning to put her office building in <br />this area, the reason for allowing it was that it would be a <br />buffer between the automobile agency and the residential area. <br />He stated that he did not object to Mrs. Reeves' building, and if <br />the rest could be developed like that, he would not object. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard, and <br />the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, to deny the request to amend <br />the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate the subject <br />area to commercial.and also to deny the request for <br />rezoning to CL because of the problems with 6th <br />Avenue and also 16th Place and because the subject <br />property is too small to really take care of the <br />drainage problem. <br />Commissioner Bird asked where that leaves the property as <br />far as future potential is concerned, and Chief Planner Shearer <br />noted that it is currently RM -10, but this would not close the <br />door on professional offices, which staff is considering for the <br />area. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that he generally looks at the <br />property owner's rights and then tries to see what adverse <br />effects they would have. In this case, he felt there is a gray <br />area, and he also had some questions re the difference between <br />limited commercial and professional offices. Commissioner Bird <br />did feel there is more of a demand for commercial retail space <br />than office space. The corridor to the Merrill Barber Bridge is <br />solid commercial on both sides and there is rarely ever a <br />vacancy; 17th St. is an area in transition, and there will be <br />constant requests coming before the Board to utilize this <br />property which he did not feel will ever be used as residential. <br />24 <br />